Cowen v. St. Louis & Iron Mountain R.R. Co.

Decision Date31 October 1871
Citation48 Mo. 556
PartiesJOHN E. COWEN, Respondent, v. THE ST. LOUIS & IRON MOUNTAIN RAILROAD COMPANY, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court.

Dryden & Dryden, for appellant.

Pipkin, for respondent.

WAGNER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.

None of the objections urged for a reversal of the judgment in this case were brought to the attention of the court below in a motion for a new trial. No opportunity was allowed for the court to correct its errors, if any it committed. The points now made are that the court erred in admitting a deposition to be read in evidence, and also in giving instructions. The only reasons assigned in the motion for a new trial are that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the same was for the plaintiff when it should have been for the defendant. The questions raised here were not submitted to the Circuit Court.

Judgment affirmed.

The other judges concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
35 cases
  • Baker v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & M. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 24, 1894
    ...we will not consider objections to the action of the lower court which were not made the basis of a motion for a new trial. Cowen v. Railroad Co., 48 Mo. 556; Matlock v. Williams, 59 Mo. 105; Haynes v. Town of Trenton, 108 Mo. 123, 18 S. W. 1003; Gordon v. Gordon, 13 Mo. 215; Broughton v. B......
  • Kansas City v. Bacon
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1898
    ... ... Hospital, 50 Mo. 156; Farrar v. St. Louis, 80 ... Mo. 379; State v. City of Kansas, 89 Mo. 36; ... definite to authorize the evidence offered. Cowen v ... Railroad, 48 Mo. 556; Vineyard v. Matney, 68 ... ...
  • Baker v. The Kansas City, fort Scott & Memphis v. Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 4, 1894
    ...the action of the lower court in giving or refusing instructions which were not assigned as error in the motion for a new trial. Cowen v. Railroad, 48 Mo. 556; Gaines Frender, 82 Mo. 497; State v. Grimes, 101 Mo. 188; Haynes v. Trenton, 108 Mo. 123. (13) Indeed, objections to instructions c......
  • Shohoney v. Quincy, Omaha & Kansas City Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 27, 1909
    ... ... Railroad, 101 Mich. 597; Swizel v ... Odanoh Iron Co., 116 Mich. 149; Cossolmon v ... Dunfer, 69 N.Y.S ... court cites the following cases: Cowen v. Railroad, ... 48 Mo. 556; Saxton v. Allen, 49 Mo ... In the latest case cited by the St. Louis Court of Appeals in ... the case first above mentioned, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT