Cox's Admr. v. C., N.O. & T.P. Railway Co.

Decision Date10 March 1931
PartiesCox's Administrator v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company et al. (Two Cases.)
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Appeals from McCreary Circuit Court.

STEPHENS & STEELEY for appellants.

TYE, SILER, GILLIS & SILER for appellees.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE RICHARDSON.

Reversing.

About 8 a.m. on June 24, 1929, S.T. Cox and his wife, Zelpha Cox, while traveling in a Chevrolet coupe on the highway which crosses the tracks of the appellee at a station called Revilo, in McCreary county, were struck and killed by a train of the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, which train consisted of an engine, coal tender, and one car.

The administrator of Zelpha Cox was duly appointed, qualified, and filed an action to recover damages for her estate, resulting from her death, against the appellees, Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, Fayette Thompson, and _______ Smith, who were the engineer and fireman, respectively, on the train which struck the automobile in which she was traveling.

The administrator of S.T. Cox was duly appointed and qualified and filed an action to recover damages resulting from S.T. Cox's death, against the appellees. By agreement the two actions were consolidated and heard together. At the conclusion of appellants' evidence, on motion of the appellees, the court gave to the jury a peremptory instruction to find for them. Judgment was entered on this verdict, dismissing the petitions with cost. From it, this appeal is prosecuted.

Revilo is a station on the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway, situated on the outskirts of Stearns, an unincorporated town in McCreary county. S. T. Cox and Zelpha Cox resided in the vicinity of this crossing, on the Pine Knot road. They were familiar with this crossing. The highway crosses the railway tracks on a grade. The Highway is known as "The Airline to Lookout Mountain Route from Cincinnati to Chattanooga."

The highway runs practically parallel with the railroad through the county in a northern and southern direction. It is in sight of the railway tracks from three-quarters to one mile south of Revilo. There are three tracks at this crossing. The north-bound is on the east, the storage in the middle, and the south-bound is on the west. As the highway comes from the south at about 150 feet of the crossing, it makes a right angle turn to the left. On the left of it is a garage building. The storehouse, dwelling, and a few trees are located right along the highway. The garage is 150 to 200 feet south of the store, and on the east side of the railroad. The highway, after you turn to the right, goes down a grade. On the righthand side of it, there are two section houses and an embankment. The embankment is higher at section house No. 2 than at section house No. 1. A fence runs down from the right of the ground on which these section houses are built to within a few feet of the north-bound track. As a car approaches from the south on this highway, its occupants are unable for a short distance to see a train that comes from the north until they are within a few feet of the north-bound track, or within about 12 feet of it. The track some 200 or 250 feet to the south of the crossing curves to the right. The track north of the crossing comes out of what is known as "Sand Cut," estimated to be 30 to 35 feet deep and situated on a curve. "Sand Cut" was cut out of the surface of the ground for the purpose of grading the track.

At the time of the accident, the train which struck and killed decedents was backing toward the crossing from Sand Cut, which is about 800 or 900 feet north of the crossing. The rate of speed at which it is estimated to have been traveling varies from 15 to 35 miles per hour. The automobile came along the highway on the east side of the north-bound track, turned to the left passing through a cut in the road, crossed the north-bound track, and as they approached the south-bound track, the car in which they were traveling was struck. Mrs. Cox was instantly killed and Mr. Cox died within about two hours. As they turned to the left to approach the crossing, the section houses were on their right and on the property of the railway company, and were at that time occupied by employees of the railway company. These section houses cut off their view, looking north toward Sand Cut, of the train as it was backing from Sand Cut toward the crossing. No employee of the railway company was on the back end of the train. The whistle was blown twice for the crossing about the time it came out of Sand Cut. The whistling post is 825 feet from the crossing. No other whistle was blown, and no bell was rung or other signal given to indicate the presence of the movement of the train or to indicate the intention of those in charge of the train to use the crossing.

The testimony as to whether deceased S.T. Cox, who was driving the automobile, at the time he drove onto the north track, was looking to the south, or down the track opposite the direction in which the train was backing, or directly across the track, varies. The engine of the train of cars was between the tender and caboose, on the opposite end from the crossing. The testimony as to whether S.T. Cox increased his speed before or at the time the car was struck, or continued at the same rate at which they approached the north-bound track, is conflicting. The deceased S.T. Cox was somewhat deaf.

The question presented on this appeal is: Did the court err in giving a peremptory instruction?

The appellee insists that both S.T. Cox and Zelpha Cox were guilty of contributory negligence, and therefore their estates are precluded from a recovery, and the giving of the peremptory instruction was proper. To sustain this contention they cite the cases of Long Fork Ry. Co. v. Martin, 212 Ky. 182, 278 S.W. 550; Cumberland River Ry. Co. v. Walton, 166 Ky. 371, 179 S.W. 245; Barrett's Adm'r v. L. & N.R.R. Co., 206 Ky. 662, 268 S.W. 283; Taylor's Adm'r v. K. & T. Ry. Co., 229 Ky. 129, 16 S.W. (2d) 785; Voorheis' Adm'r v. Chesapeaks & O.R.R. Co., 220 Ky. 746, 295 S.W. 1031; ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Sabiston's Adm'R v. Otis Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • November 9, 1933
    ...of the elevator by passengers. It is a familiar rule that contributory negligence will never be presumed. Cox's Adm'r v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T.P.R. Co., 238 Ky. 312, 37 S.W. (2d) 859. concomitant of this rule is that in every case the plaintiff charging negligence must establish, not that t......
  • Sabiston's Adm'r v. Otis Elevator Co.
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • November 9, 1933
    ... ...          "No ... 1. All elevators, installation of elevators, elevator ... ...
  • Kelsch's Guardian v. C. & O. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • November 14, 1933
    ...98 S.W. 308, 30 Ky. Law Rep. 359; Louisville & N.R. Co. v. Treanor's Adm'r, 179 Ky. 350, 200 S.W. 634; Cox's Adm'r v. Cincinnati, N.O. & T.P. Railroad Co., 238 Ky. 312, 37 S.W. (2d) 859. What degree of care is required of railroad companies to protect travelers at a crossing depends upon th......
  • Justice's Admr. v. C. & O.R. Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • February 19, 1932
    ...crossing accident and which are, Big Sandy & Kentucky River Co. v. Keaton, 206 Ky. 156, 266 S.W. 1056, and Cox's Admr. v. C., N.O. & T.P. Railway Co., 238 Ky. 312, 37 S.W. (2d) 859. The others involved occurring on or near the track of the defendant railroad company, and where the injured p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT