Cox v. Hinshaw

Decision Date20 November 1946
Docket Number390
Citation40 S.E.2d 358,226 N.C. 700
PartiesCOX v. HINSHAW et al.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Pursuant to an oral agreement, the plaintiff executed to the defendants a deed in fee simple to certain lands in Randolph County upon certain conditions set out in the deed. The defendants joined in the execution of the instrument, constituting it both a deed and a contract.

The conditions relate to the support of the grantor, furnishing him medical attention, the care and operation of a mill and ice plant situated on the property, payment to the grantor of a specified portion of the net profits, and numerous other matters. As directly bearing on this controversy, the following may be quoted: '1. The grantees herein, D. D. Hinshaw and Lena Hinshaw, his wife are to move into the home of the grantor, T. L. Cox, and take over the running of said home, maintain and provide the said T. L. Cox with a peaceful, quiet and comfortable home during the remainder of his natural life, including subsistence washing, fuel, doctor bills, hospital care, if needed, and all other things reasonably necessary for his care and comfort.'

A clause in the deed provides for arbitration of any differences which might arise between the parties respecting the performance of the conditions.

The parties deposited the deed in escrow with the First National Bank of Asheboro, to be delivered to the defendants upon the death of the grantor, provided meantime they had performed the conditions named in the deed and contract.

The defendants moved into the home of the grantor some time in September, 1944, and undertook performance of their duties as specified in the deed. The parties lived together in the home until September, 1945, when a disagreement having arisen between them, the plaintiff suggested to the defendants that either they or he should leave since conditions brought about by the defendants were no longer bearable; and contending that his action was caused by a breach of the conditions in the deed requiring the defendants to 'maintain and provide said T. L. Cox with a peaceful, quiet and comfortable home during the remainder of his natural life,' left the home and has since resided elsewhere. On October 22 following, he brought this action to cancel the deed because of the breach of the conditions therein. The case came on for trial at July Term, 1946, of Randolph Superior Court.

In view of the conclusion we have reached, it is necessary only to summarize the plaintiff's evidence relating to the obligations of the defendants, made a condition precedent to the deed, to maintain and provide for the plaintiff a peaceful, quiet and comfortable home during the remainder of his natural life, without special reference to other conditions claimed to have been broken.

Pertinent to this condition, the plaintiff testified on the trial 'The home provided by the defendants formerly was a happy and peaceful home part of the time, and part of the time it was not. A lot of stuff went along that I never said anything about. My table, where I kept my papers--they were tangled or stacked up or piled up different. Gave me trouble. Lay them down and go off. These papers were newspapers and magazines. I told Mrs. Hinshaw I did not like my papers to be torn up, but my telling her this did not make any effect * * * I have my junk or scrap pile, good pieces of anything I want, lumber or blocks that I need around a place like that, and they used them and burned them; used up my stuff like that. I found this out several times since the Hinshaws came there * * * Lena Hinshaw said that stuff was not any account; it was rotten. I said if it was rotten it would not do much good cooking. I went in the house and turned on my radio. In a few minutes her mother came to the door and said Lena (Mrs. Hinshaw) was crying. I asked her what she was crying about. She said what I said to her. I told her that I did not say anything to make anybody cry. Then they had supper ready. Mrs. Stout said for us to come to supper. While we were sitting at the table eating Lena did not come to the table.'

The plaintiff testified that later Delbert Hinshaw 'rared out on him and told him he couldn't talk that way to make her cry. Mr. Hinshaw got to talking and said we would mix. He was angry to some extent, it seemed like. ' Hinshaw made no demonstration of any kind. Did not get up.

Pursuing the conversation, after Mrs. Hinshaw came in, 'She went to talking about the wood was no account. After they said I was no gentleman, I didn't like it, because I hadn't said anything out of the way, told them what I had said, it was a Fred Stanley proposition; he was the only person I had about me that burned up my stuff. We were talking there I expect thirty minutes. I said that I wasn't going to live in a fuss. I told Mr. and Mrs. Hinshaw if we couldn't live together in peace for them to leave; that I wouldn't live in a fuss, under any condition; if we couldn't live in peace and get along for them to just get out. After we talked a right smart, I told Mr. and Mrs. Hinshaw several things that wasn't kept like it should have been; I told them there was a scent around there somewhere. They suggested that it was a dead rat in my room. There was a baby there in the house and this old lady a grand aunt of Mrs. Hinshaw, Lidy Walker, who was sick. I have seen them throw clothes from the sick bed and diapers which the baby had used down the steps into the basement. These soiled clothes would stay in the basement until they were washed. They washed twice a week. The basement was directly under my room. The basement stairs went under the stairs that went upstairs. The door to the basement went right out of my door. I told them they were filthy; that I couldn't stand it, never had lived under such conditions. The throwing of these clothes into the basement had been going on for a month or so. The odor from these clothes was not so bad with me; I haven't got sensitive to smell; but I did smell this.'

'I told them they didn't treat their mother, Mrs. Stout, like they should. I told them that they treated her like she was a slave. She did all the cooking, washing dishes and such as that. I told them that I wasn't going to live in a fuss. After I told them this Lena (Mrs. Hinshaw) said, 'Oh, just let it all go, let it all be over;' after they had given me a run. Mrs. Hinshaw was out of fix when she was talking to me, until the last, when she wanted it all settled down. She was made, and talked using a high, angry tone. I left about four o'clock next morning going to my brother's. I had made arrangements the day before to start to Florida. I got up early and went to the car house. Lena wanted me to go to the house and get breakfast. I told her I would get breakfast when I got to my brother's at Greensboro.'

Witness explained that prior to Mrs. Hinshaw's bit of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT