Cox v. Johnson
| Citation | 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 418,638 S.W.2d 867 |
| Decision Date | 07 July 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. C-1237,C-1237 |
| Parties | Paul COX, Petitioner, v. Glenn JOHNSON, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Kim Cox and Paul Dodson, Corpus Christi, for petitioner.
Charles R. Cunningham, Corpus Christi, for respondent.
This is a suit brought by Paul Cox to recover on a promissory note executed by Glenn Johnson. The trial court rendered a default judgment for Cox and overruled Johnson's motion for new trial. The court of appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause for a new trial, holding that the trial court had committed fundamental error in allowing recovery on the note without the joinder of a joint payee. 630 S.W.2d 492. We refuse the application for writ of error of Paul Cox, no reversible error; however, we disapprove the holding of the court of appeals that the failure to join an additional party constituted fundamental error.
The court of appeals held the trial court erred in rendering judgment for Cox without joinder of Dan M. Bates, the joint payee on the note. This error was raised for the first time on appeal. The court of appeals relied upon our decision in Petroleum Anchor Equip. v. Tyra, 406 S.W.2d 891 (Tex.1966) and its own decision in Hinojosa v. Love, 496 S.W.2d 224 (Tex.App.--Corpus Christi 1973, no writ), in holding that failure to join Bates was fundamental error.
Fundamental or unassigned error is a discredited doctrine. See American General Fire and Casualty Co. v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688, 25 Tex.Sup.Ct.J. 405 (1982); Texas Industrial Traffic League v. Railroad Commission of Texas, 633 S.W.2d 821 (Tex.1982); Buckholts Ind. School Dist. v. Glaser, 632 S.W.2d 146 (Tex.1982); Pirtle v. Gregory, 629 S.W.2d 919 (Tex.1982); Greater Fort Worth & Tarrant County Community Action Agency v. Mims, 627 S.W.2d 149 (Tex.1982); Vondy v. Commissioners Court of Uvalde County, 620 S.W.2d 104 (Tex.1981); Hooks v. Texas Dept. Water Resources, 611 S.W.2d 417 (Tex.1981). Fundamental error survives today only in those rare instances in which the record shows on its face that the court lacked jurisdiction or that the public interest is directly and adversely affected as that interest is declared in the statutes and constitution of this state. Texas Ind. Traffic League v. Railroad Commission of Texas, supra; Pirtle v. Gregory, supra; Ramsey v. Dunlop, 146 Tex. 196, 205 S.W.2d 979 (1947).
Petroleum Anchor Equip. v. Tyra was decided before amendments to the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure changed our approach in dealing with a defect of parties from one which emphasized jurisdiction to an approach based solely upon pragmatic considerations. Cooper v. Texas Gulf Industries, Inc., 513 S.W.2d 200, 203 (Tex.1974). Under our present rule, "[i]t would be rare indeed if there were a person whose presence was so indispensable in the sense that his absence deprives the court of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United Statesa Tex. Lloyds Co. v. Menchaca
...Fire & Cas. Co. v. Weinberg , 639 S.W.2d 688, 689 (Tex. 1982), and "a discredited doctrine," B.L.D. , 113 S.W.3d at 350 (quoting Cox , 638 S.W.2d at 868 ).Soon after our decisions in Little Rock Furniture and Ramsey , we warned that cases "discussing fundamental error decided before the ado......
-
Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control Bd.
...S.W.2d 7, 8 (Tex.1986) (per curiam); American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. Weinberg, 639 S.W.2d 688 (Tex.1982); Cox v. Johnson, 638 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Tex.1982) (per curiam). Time and time again, the courts of appeals have also refused to consider challenges to standing not first raised in ......
-
In re B.L.D.
...our strong policy considerations favoring preservation, we have called fundamental error "a discredited doctrine." Cox v. Johnson, 638 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Tex.1982) (per curiam). Nevertheless, we have employed fundamental error in rare instances to review certain types of unpreserved or unassi......
-
Estate of Pollack v. McMurrey
...interest is directly and adversely affected as that interest is declared in the statutes and constitution of this state. Cox v. Johnson, 638 S.W.2d 867, 868 (Tex.1982) (citations Lack of jurisdiction is far and away the most common example of fundamental error. See, e.g., Mapco, Inc. v. Car......