Coxen v. Western Empire Life Ins. Co., 22492
| Decision Date | 24 March 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 22492,22492 |
| Citation | 452 P.2d 16,168 Colo. 444 |
| Parties | Thelma COXEN, Executrix of the Estate of Calvin Coxen, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error. v. WESTERN EMPIRE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, and Jefferson County Bank of Lakewood, Colorado, a Colorado banking corporation, Defendants in Error. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
George J. Robinson, William H. Robinson, III, Lakewood, for plaintiff in error.
Morris Rutland, Denver, for defendant in error Western Empire Life Ins. Co.
This was an action brought by Thelma Coxen, executrix of the estate of Calvin Coxen, deceased, (herein called the executrix) against Western Empire Life Insurance Company (herein called the company) to recover the proceeds of a credit life insurance policy in the amount of $4275 issued on the life of the decedent in connection with a loan made by the defendant in error bank. It was stipulated between the parties that the executrix might pay the loan in full and be subordinated to the bank's rights under the policy; and accordingly, she paid the loan.
It was also stipulated that the decedent died as a result of heart disease which had commenced prior to the issuance of the policy; that no statement as to a condition or disease originating prior to the issuance of the policy was asked of or given by the insured or any other person prior to issuance of the policy; that the court as a matter of law was to determine the sole issue presented solely from the provisions of the policy; and that, if the executrix is entitled to recover, the amount recoverable is $4232.25 plus interest thereon from July 16, 1965, together with costs. The issue was whether the pre-existing disease was a defense to the action under the following provision of the policy:
'In consideration of the above premium, paid in advance, the company hereby insures the above named insured subject to the provisions and limitations herein contained * * * against loss of life and/or against disability caused by disease originating or injury sustained during the term of this policy.'
The question presented is whether 'disease originating or injury sustained during the term of this policy' relates to 'loss of life' as well as to 'disability.' The trial court answered this in the affirmative and denied relief.
Webster's New International Dictionary 99 (2nd ed. 1958) defines 'and/or' as either 'and' or 'or.' If it is to be construed as meaning 'and' in this situation, then, as the executrix believes, the phrase 'during the term of this policy' relates only to 'disability.' If 'and/or' is to be given the meaning of 'or,' the phrase 'during the term of this policy' modifies 'loss of life' as well as 'disability,' and the company prevails.
We approach this matter with the following basic propositions: (1) the clause is patently ambiguous; (2) under the stipulation one cannot look beyond the policy to ascertain intent; and (3) in case of an ambiguity, the matter is to be construed most strongly against the insurer. Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Hemenover, 100 Colo. 231, 67 P.2d 80, 100 A.L.R. 1270.
The trial court reached its determination principally by reason of another provision of the policy which reads as follows:
'No claim for loss incurred or disability, as defined in the policy, commencing after...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Johnson
...Ins. Co., 811 P.2d 1083, 1090 (Colo.1991). See Republic Ins. Co. v. Jernigan, 753 P.2d 229 (Colo.1988); Coxen v. Western Empire Life Ins. Co., 168 Colo. 444, 452 P.2d 16 (1969); Ferndale Dev. Co., Inc. v. Great American Ins. Co., 34 Colo.App. 258, 527 P.2d 939 The insurance contract in this......
-
Republic Ins. Co. v. Jernigan, 86SC13
...there is ambiguity or uncertainty as to coverage, courts should construe the policy in favor of the insured. Coxen v. Western Empire Life Ins. Co., 168 Colo. 444, 452 P.2d 16 (1969); see United Bank of Pueblo v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co., 529 F.2d 490 (10th Cir.1976). We agree with the......
-
Carroll v. CUNA Mut. Ins. Soc., 94SC161
...ambiguous terms in an insurance contract against the insurer. Reed, 176 Colo. at 572, 491 P.2d at 1379; Coxen v. Western Empire Life Ins. Co., 168 Colo. 444, 447, 452 P.2d 16, 17 (1969). Courts have had difficulty crafting a definition of the term "accident" that will fairly apply to all co......
-
Chacon v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.
...Id.; see also Commercial Union Ins. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 546 F.Supp. 543 (D.Colo.1982); Coxen v. Western Empire Life Ins. Co., 168 Colo. 444, 452 P.2d 16 (1969). In Republic Insurance Co. v. Jernigan, 753 P.2d 229 (Colo.1988), we considered an insurance policy which contai......