Crain v. Bordenkircher, 16646
Decision Date | 21 December 1994 |
Docket Number | No. 16646,16646 |
Citation | 192 W.Va. 416,452 S.E.2d 732 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Robert Carl CRAIN, et al., Petitioners, v. Donald E. BORDENKIRCHER, Warden, et al., Respondents. |
Syllabus by the Court
Syllabus, Crain v. Bordenkircher, 189 W.Va. 588, 433 S.E.2d 526 (1993).
James F. Companion, Schrader, Recht, Byrd, Companion & Gurley; and Barbara L. Baxter, West Virginia Legal Services Plan, Inc., Wheeling, for petitioners.
Rita A. Stuart, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Charleston, for respondents.
On November 29, 1994, pursuant to this Court's order of July 14, 1994, the respondents, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, et al., filed with this Court a status report on the progress of construction of the new state penitentiary, the Mount Olive Correctional Complex (hereinafter "MOCC").
The report provided information on final inspections, security and training, the awarding of the medical and food service contracts and the inmate disciplinary policy. The report further indicated that inmates from the West Virginia Penitentiary at Moundsville (hereinafter "WVP") will begin moving into MOCC in early January 1995. 1 The parties herein have agreed to meet with the Special Master, Patrick McManus, before the end of 1994 to review all areas of operation and to assure that all of this Court's mandates have been met.
Since the deplorable conditions of the inmates' confinement at the WVP were originally detailed in Crain v. Bordenkircher, 176 W.Va. 338, 342 S.E.2d 422 (1986), this Court has monitored the progress of the new penitentiary, the construction of which was ordered to remedy the unconstitutional conditions at the WVP. Crain, 180 W.Va. 246, 376 S.E.2d 140 (1988). As we have previously stated: Syllabus, Crain v. Bordenkircher, 189 W.Va. 588, 433 S.E.2d 526 (1993). A thorough recitation of the numerous cases styled Crain v. Bordenkircher which have been before this...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Brown v. Thompson
-
Crain v. Bordenkircher, 16646
...Asst. Atty. Gen., W. Va. Div. of Corrections, Charleston, for appellees. PER CURIAM: In our most recent opinion of Crain v. Bordenkircher, 192 W.Va. 416, 452 S.E.2d 732 (1994), we directed the respondents, Donald E. Bordenkircher, Warden, West Virginia Penitentiary, et al., to appear before......