Cranston v. Union Trust Co.

Decision Date31 October 1881
Citation75 Mo. 29
PartiesCRANSTON v. THE UNION TRUST COMPANY et al., Appellants.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from Monroe Circuit Court.--HON. JOHN T. REDD, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

T. J. Portis and E. A. Andrews for appellants.

A. M. Alexander for respondent.

HOUGH, J.

This was a suit instituted in the circuit court of Monroe county, to enforce a lien against the railroad of defendant, for work done upon its road-bed amounting in value to the sum of $22.43. The plaintiff recovered judgment and the defendants have appealed. Two grounds of error are alleged. 1st, That as the amount sued for was less than $50, the circuit court had no jurisdiction. 2nd, That the lien should have been enforced only against that portion of defendant's road which was benefited by the plaintiff's labor.

Section 1102 of the Revised Statutes confers upon circuit courts “exclusive original jurisdiction in all civil cases, which shall not be cognizable before the county courts, probate courts and justices of the peace, and not otherwise provided by law.” Article 4, chapter 44 of the Revised Statutes confers jurisdiction upon justices of the peace to enforce ordinary mechanics' liens, but no jurisdiction has ever been conferred upon justices of the peace to enforce liens against railroads. Under section 1102 of the Revised Statutes, the circuit court has exclusive jurisdiction of such suits.

The second point relied upon by defendants, has been recently decided by this court against them, in the case of Knapp v. St. Louis, K. C. & N. R'y Co., 74 Mo. 374.

The judgment of the circuit court will, therefore, be affirmed.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas R. Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 17, 1904
    ...under out statute. Dunn v. Railroad, 24 Mo. 493; McPheeters v. Bridge Co., 28 Mo. 467; Schulenberg v. Railroad, 67 Mo. 442; Cranston v. Railroad, 75 Mo. 29; Knapp Railroad, 74 Mo. 374; Ireland v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 572; Bethune v. Railroad, 149 Mo. 587. (6) The evidence shows that all of the ......
  • The Gilsonite Construction Company v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1912
    ... ... it, within the State. [Knapp v. St. Louis, K. C. & N. Ry ... Co., 74 Mo. 374; Cranston v. Union Trust Co., 75 Mo ...          Other ... cases are cited in the quotation first ... ...
  • Heman Construction Co. v. Wabash Railroad Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 13, 1907
    ...Railroad, 24 Mo. 493; McPheeters v. Bridge Co., 28 Mo. 467; Schulenburg v. Railroad, 67 Mo. 442; Knapp v. Railroad, 74 Mo. 374; Cranston v. Trust Co., 75 Mo. 29; v. Railroad, 79 Mo. 572; Skrainka v. Rohan, 18 Mo.App. 345; Dugan v. Railroad, 43 Mo.App. 675. (4) The court has no power to dete......
  • Oregon Short Line Railroad Co. v. Pioneer Irrigation District
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • May 26, 1909
    ... ... Western P. R. Co., 47 Cal. 87; Knapp v ... St. Louis etc. R. Co., 74 Mo. 374; Cranston v. Union ... Trust Co., 75 Mo. 29; Macon etc. R. Co. v ... Parker, 9 Ga. 377; 2 Elliott on ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT