Craton v. Sinclair
| Decision Date | 19 January 1943 |
| Parties | CRATON v. SINCLAIR, Sheriff. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Feb. 8, 1943.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Polk County; D. O. Rogers, Judge.
D. C. Laird, of Lakeland, for appellant.
J. Tom Watson, Atty. Gen., and Woodrow M. Melvin, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Appeal brings for review judgment of remand in habeas corpus proceedings instituted after trial and conviction.
All matters complained of should have been presented by motion to quash when amendments could have been legally made to meet objections. The information is not void.
We find no reversible error disclosed by the record and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Brown v. State
... ... shall be heard before the [152 Fla. 857] filing of a plea to ... the information.' See also Craton v. Sinclair, ... Sheriff, Fla., 11 So.2d 475. In that case the infirmity ... of the information was brought to the attention of the court ... in ... ...
-
Petersen v. Mayo
...158 Fla. 737, 30 So.2d 102; Ex parte Stirrup, 155 Fla. 173, 19 So.2d 712; Ritter v. Sinclair, 154 Fla. 272, 17 So.2d 97; Craton v. Sinclair, 152 Fla. 292, 11 So.2d 475. The sufficiency of the evidence would be a proper subject to be reviewed on appeal but not on habeas corpus in this Court.......
-
Stack v. State ex rel. LaFratta
...refiled. This distinction is to be found in erroneous proceedings as against proceeding without authority of law. See Craton v. Sinclair, 1943, 152 Fla. 292, 11 So.2d 475. We have considered as counsel requested the case of Dallas v. Wainwright, Fla.1965, 175 So.2d 785. It is irrelevant her......
- Craton v. Sinclair