Crawford v. Sanders
| Decision Date | 20 January 1897 |
| Citation | 38 S.W. 820 |
| Parties | CRAWFORD v. SANDERS et al.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, Frio county; M. F. Lowe, Judge.
Action by G. W. Sanders & Bro. against W. L. Crawford. From a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed. For former report, see 29 S. W. 102.
B. B. Rose, for appellant. Mason Maney, for appellees.
This is the second appeal to this court by Mr. Crawford from a judgment against him. 29 S. W. 102. After the cause was remanded, the proceedings seem to have been in accordance with our former opinion. The assignments of error which call in question the proceedings had in consonance with our directions then given will not be considered.
The justness of the account sued upon is not questioned, but the contention is that most of the items were purchased from G. W. Sanders before his brother became his partner. This may be so, but as the account was made out and sued upon in the name of G. W. Sanders & Bro., and G. W. Sanders testified that account belonged to the firm of G. W. Sanders & Bro., the pleadings being oral, it will be presumed that they were sufficient to support such evidence. The judgment is affirmed.
1. Rehearing denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Employers' Indemnity Corporation v. Woods
-
Amarillo Commercial Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.
...time the account was filed, from which the justice received that information, and which he failed to note upon the docket. Crawford v. Sanders (Civ. App.) 38 S. W. 820; Daniel v. Brewton (Civ. App.) 136 S. W. 815; Howard v. Faggard (Civ. App.) 32 S. W. 188; Bowman v. S. W. Land Co. (Civ. Ap......