Crawford v. State

Decision Date12 December 1963
Docket Number6 Div. 39
Citation159 So.2d 457,276 Ala. 98
PartiesJohn S. CRAWFORD v. STATE of Alabama.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Geo. S. Wright, Tuscaloosa, for petitioner.

Richmond M. Flowers, Atty. Gen., and David W. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

MERRILL, Justice.

This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review and revise the judgment of the Court of Appeals in the case of Crawford v. State of Alabama, 159 So.2d 457.

The Court of Appeals rendered no opinion in the case, simply writing upon the record, 'Affirmed (No Op.) Cates, J.'

We have uniformly held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, we had nothing to review. Counts v. State, 240 Ala. 530, 200 So. 113; Smith v. State, 241 Ala. 99, 1 So.2d 313; Hathcock v. State, 259 Ala. 363, 66 So.2d 927; Graves v. State, 260 Ala. 352, 70 So.2d 808; Sartain v. State, 263 Ala. 395, 82 So.2d 347.

Writ denied.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Dunaway v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 3, 1973
    ...5 So.2d 828. 'We have uniformly held that in the absence of an opinion by the Court of Appeals, we had nothing to review. Crawford v. State, 276 Ala. 98, 159 So.2d 457, and cases there cited. This rule does not preclude us from reviewing a decision of that court where a constitutional quest......
  • Clemons v. City of Birmingham, 6 Div. 162
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1965
    ...be undertaken.--Smith v. State, 241 Ala. 99, 1 So.2d 313; Honeycutt v. State, 264 Ala. 70, 84 So.2d 362, and cases cited; Crawford v. State, 276 Ala. 98, 159 So.2d 457. However, in State v. Parrish, 242 Ala. 7, 5 So.2d 828, we held that where the question as to the correctness of a judgment......
  • Brown v. State, 2 Div. 465
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • January 7, 1965
    ...be undertaken. Smith v. State, 241 Ala. 99, 1 So.2d 313; Honeycutt v. State, 264 Ala. 70, 84 So.2d 362, and cases cited; Crawford v. State, 276 Ala. 98, 159 So.2d 457. But in State v. Parrish, 242 Ala. 7, 5 So.2d 828, we said that where the question as to the correctness of the judgment of ......
  • Wheat v. State, 8 Div. 268
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • August 24, 1967
    ...before us to review. See: Wright v. State, 279 Ala. 84, 181 So.2d 898; Gandy v. State, 276 Ala. 409, 410, 162 So.2d 620; Crawford v. State, 276 Ala. 98, 159 So.2d 457; Keel v. State, 274 Ala. 350, 148 So.2d Neither a constitutional question (see: Wright v. State, supra; Gandy v. State, supr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT