Crawley v. Munson

Decision Date24 December 1929
Citation131 Or. 428,283 P. 29
PartiesCRAWLEY v. MUNSON, DISTRICT SCHOOL CLERK.
CourtOregon Supreme Court

Department 2.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Clatsop County; H. K. Zimmerman, Judge.

Proceeding by W. C. Crawley, receiver of the Astoria National Bank, for writ of mandamus to be directed to Clara C. Munson, as District Clerk of School District No. 30, Clatsop County. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed, with permission to appellant to apply for amendment of writ.

On November 23, 1928, plaintiff and appellant filed in the circuit court of Clatsop county his verified petition for an alternative writ of mandamus, and on the same day the writ was issued requiring the defendant to show cause as of December 7, 1928. On January 28, 1929, an order was made allowing the original petition and alternative writ to be amended. The amended writ, omitting title and verification and formal allegations as to qualifications of plaintiff to maintain this action is as follows:

"The State of Oregon to Clara C. Munson, District Clerk of School District No. 30, of Clatsop County, Oregon Greeting:

"Whereas by the verified petition of W. C. Crawley, as Receiver of the Astoria National Bank, a corporation insolvent plaintiff, it appears to this court as follows: * * *

"That School District No. 30 of Clatsop County, state of Oregon was and is during all times herein mentioned a duly organized and existing municipal corporation and school district of the second class, under and by virtue of the laws of the state of Oregon.

"That the defendant Clara C. Munson was and is during all times herein mentioned, the duly elected, qualified, and acting district school clerk of said School District No. 30 of Clatsop County, and as such, charged with the payment of all warrants so issued by said school district, in the order in which the same are indorsed, and upon funds becoming available for the payment of the same.

"That heretofore, and on November 5, 1926, said School District No. 30 of Clatsop County issued, or caused to be issued, by due and proper authority, in compliance with the laws of the state of Oregon governing school districts, its warrant in words and figures as follows:

" 'School District No. 30, Clatsop County.

" '$1.27.

" 'To Clara C. Munson, Clerk of School District No. 30 Clatsop County, Oregon:

" 'Pay to Kilham Stationery & Printing Co., or order, the sum of One 27-100 Dollars for Paper H. S. out of any money in your hands belonging to said district and not otherwise appropriated.

" 'No. 3448.

" 'Attest:

" 'Clara C. Munson, District Clerk.

" 'Edgar Deane, Chairman Board Directors.

" 'Payable at Astoria National Bank.'

"Indorsed on back:

" 'Presented for payment this 5th day of November, 1926, and not paid for want of funds.

" 'Clara C. Munson, District Clerk.'

"That the aforesaid warrant was, after its issuance, duly delivered to said Kilham Stationery & Printing Company, and was thereafter duly sold, transferred and delivered to the said Astoria National Bank for value, and said Astoria National Bank and this plaintiff, as receiver thereof, are now and have been since the indorsement thereof, the owners of and in possession of same.

"That said last mentioned warrant was duly presented to said defendant for payment on November 5, 1926, and was on said last mentioned date duly indorsed by said defendant, as said clerk: 'Not paid for want of funds.'

"That there was also issued, or caused to be issued by said School District No. 30, various and sundry of its warrants at various other times to various other persons and parties, and for various amounts, all of which warrants are in the identical form and language as set forth in the warrant as alleged in Paragraph V of said petition, and hereinbefore set forth, save and except the date thereof, the amount thereof, the payee thereof, the number thereof, and purpose for which issued, and that for the sake of brevity there is herein listed all such warrants now held and owned by the plaintiff and petitioner herein, setting forth the date of issuance, amount thereof, payee thereof, and the date presented to defendant and indorsed: 'Not paid for want of funds,' as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date. Amount. Name of Date Presented for Payment and All Indorsed Payee. "Not Paid for Want of Funds" by Defendant as Clerk of Said District. May 13, $175.00 A.S. May 13, '27. '27. Propst.

"(Note.--In such amended alternative writ of mandamus there is then listed 227 separate warrants, totaling $19,524.23, all as follows, but omitted from this abstract of record for the sake of brevity.)

"That all of the above listed and referred to warrants were heretofore, by said School District No. 30, delivered to the respective payees thereof, and that said respective payees thereof, for value received, sold, transferred, and assigned said warrants to said Astoria National Bank, and said Astoria National Bank, and this plaintiff, as receiver thereof, are now and ever since have been the owners and holders thereof and in possession thereof, and that each of said listed and above referred to warrants was duly presented to said defendant as clerk of said School District No. 30, and indorsed: 'Not paid for want of funds,' by said defendant as said school district clerk on the date or times above listed and set opposite each thereof.

"That this plaintiff has made due and several demands upon said defendant as said clerk of said school district, and upon said school district, to make payment of said warrants, and that said clerk and said school district has failed and refused to pay the same, or any part thereof.

"That section 5253 of Oregon Laws is as follows:

" '§ 5253. Application of Available Funds on Unpaid School Warrants. When any warrants, issued by any school district of this state have been or hereafter may be indorsed "not paid for want of funds," and funds shall thereafter become available for the payment of the same, such funds shall be applied in payment of such warrants in the order in which they were so indorsed.'

"That monies and funds belonging to School District No. 30 of Clatsop County, Oregon, have become available and into the hands and into the possession of said defendant since the respective dates of the indorsement on said warrants: 'Not paid for want of funds,' with which to pay said warrants, and the whole thereof, or at least the greater portion thereof, but that said defendant has failed and refused to apply said funds to the payment of said warrants, and that said defendant, notwithstanding said funds were so available, has paid, or caused to be paid warrants issued by said school district and indorsed subsequent and after the dates and times of the indorsements so affixed to said above listed warrants so owned and held by said plaintiff and petitioner herein as aforesaid, and/or has made direct payment without the issuance of warrants, of funds which by right should have been available to the payment of the said warrants now held and owned by this plaintiff, all contrary to the laws of the state of Oregon.

"That other warrants of said school district may be outstanding and unpaid which bear an indorsement 'Not paid for want of funds' prior in date as those of plaintiff herein set forth.

"That plaintiff has no plain, speedy, or adequate remedy at law.

"Now, Therefore, we, being willing that full and speedy justice should be done in the premises, do command you, the said Clara C. Munson, as district clerk of School District No. 30, that immediately after the receipt of this writ, you observe and carry out the provisions of section 5253, Oregon Laws, and particularly that you use and apply all the available funds and monies in your hands, in your possession, or under your custody and control as clerk of said School District No. 30, to the payment of outstanding warrants of said school district in the order of their indorsement, and that you forthwith cease to make payment of any warrants so issued by the said School District No. 30 from funds available which shall bear indorsement or does bear indorsement 'not paid for want of funds' subsequent to and after the respective dates of indorsement on all said above referred to and listed warrants now owned and held by plaintiff herein, and that you further, as such school clerk, cease making payment direct from funds available which by right should and ought to be applied to the payment of warrants of said district indorsed 'not paid for want of funds,' or that you appear before this court in the court room thereof in the courthouse at Astoria, Oregon, on the 7th day of December, 1928, at the hour of 10:00 o'clock in the forenoon of said day, and show cause why you have not done so, and that you then and there return this writ with your certificate annexed of having done as commanded, or the cause of your omission thereof.

"Witness the Honorable J. A. Eakin, Judge of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the County of Clatsop, and the seal of said court affixed by the clerk thereof, at Astoria, Oregon, this 23d day of November, 1928. J. C. Clinton, Clerk of the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Johnson v. Craddock
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 27 Septiembre 1961
    ...in other actions and, therefore, must state all the material facts and show a clear right to the relief demanded. Crawley v. Munson, 131 Or. 428, 435, 283 P. 29; United States of America v. Cohn, 201 Or. 680, 684, 272 P.2d 982. The writ must reveal, at least prima facie, a clear and existin......
  • U.S. v. Cohn
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 30 Junio 1954
    ...be attached to and made a part of the writ or, in lieu thereof, pleaded therein. Otherwise, it is not before the court. Crawley v. Munson, 131 Or. 428, 283 P. 29; State ex rel. Bell v. Pierce, 118 Or. 533, 247 P. 812; Elliott v. Oliver, 22 Or. 44, 29 P. 'The defective writ in this proceedin......
  • International Transp. Equipment Lessors, Inc. v. Bohannon
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 29 Enero 1969
    ...in other actions and, therefore, must state all the material facts and show a clear right to the relief demanded. Crawley v. Munson, 131 Or. 428, 435, 283 P. 29; United States of America v. Cohn, 201 Or. 680, 684, 272 P.2d 982. The writ must reveal, at least prima facie, a clear and existin......
  • Olds v. Kirkpatrick et al.
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • 16 Marzo 1948
    ... ... Paine v. Wells, 89 Or. 695, 699, 175 P. 430; Lyons v. Gram, 122 Or. 684, 690, 260 P. 220; Crawley v. Munson, 131 Or. 428, 435, 283 ... 183 Or. 112 ... P. 29; Morris, Mather & Co. v. Port of Astoria, 141 Or. 251, 268, 15 P. (2d) 385. It did not do ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT