Crawley v. State, 87-767
| Decision Date | 08 March 1989 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-767,87-767 |
| Citation | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657,539 So.2d 1162 |
| Parties | 14 Fla. L. Weekly 657 David Edward CRAWLEY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and T. Orin Lee, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and William I. Munsey, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
The appellant's contention that he was misadvised as to the consequences of his nolo contendere plea is not properly presented in a direct appeal; it should be raised in the trial court on a motion to withdraw the plea or a motion to vacate pursuant to rule 3.850 of the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The appeal is dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
Ponderosa, Inc. v. Stephens, 88-2514
... ... 14 Fla. L. Weekly 655 ... PONDEROSA, INC., a Delaware corporation doing business in the State of Florida, Appellant, ... Carolyn STEPHENS and Jo Stephens, her husband, Appellees ... No ... ...
-
McCarty v. State, 92-0417
...a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Isley v. State, 565 So.2d 389 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), and Crawley v. State, 539 So.2d 1162 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). HERSEY, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., ...