Creamery Hills, L.P. v. Fox
Decision Date | 18 October 2021 |
Docket Number | EF21-258 |
Citation | 73 Misc.3d 728,155 N.Y.S.3d 746 |
Parties | CREAMERY HILLS, L.P. and SEPP, Inc., Petitioners, v. Laura FOX, in her capacity as the Director of Real Property Tax Services for the County of Cortland; the Assessor of the Town of Harford, New York; the Town of Harford Board of Assessment Review; the Town of Harford, New York; Cortland County ; and Dryden Central School District, Respondents |
Court | New York Supreme Court |
73 Misc.3d 728
155 N.Y.S.3d 746
CREAMERY HILLS, L.P. and SEPP, Inc., Petitioners,
v.
Laura FOX, in her capacity as the Director of Real Property Tax Services for the County of Cortland; the Assessor of the Town of Harford, New York; the Town of Harford Board of Assessment Review; the Town of Harford, New York; Cortland County ; and Dryden Central School District, Respondents
EF21-258
Supreme Court, New York, Cortland County.
Decided on October 18, 2021
HINMAN, HOWARD & KATTELL, LLP, By: Paul T. Sheppard, Esq., Attorneys for Petitioners, 700 Security Mutual Bldg., 80 Exchange Street, P.O. Box 5250, Binghamton, New York 13902
COSTELLO, COONEY & FEARON, PLLC, By: Christopher M. Militello, Esq., Attorney for Respondents Laurence Fitts, Assessor for the Town of Harford, Town of Harford, and Town of Harford Board of Assessment Review, 211 West Jefferson Street, Syracuse, New York 13202
MACKENZIE HUGHES LLP, By: W. Bradley Hunt, Esq., Attorneys for Respondents Laura Fox and County of Cortland, 440 S. Warren Street, Suite 400, Mackenzie Hughes Tower, Syracuse, New York 13202
HANCOCK ESTABROOK, LLP, By: James O'Shea, Esq., Attorneys for Respondent Dryden Central School District, 1800 AXA Tower I, 100 Madison Street, Syracuse, New York 13202
Mark G. Masler, J.
Petitioner Creamery Hills, L.P. (Creamery) is a limited partnership which owns and operates Creamery Hills Senior Apartments in the Town of Harford, Cortland County (the subject property). Petitioner SEPP, Inc. is the general partner of Creamery. Pursuant to an agreement with the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (the regulatory agreement), Creamery may only rent the subject property to individuals or families whose incomes at the time of initial occupancy do not exceed 60% of the area median gross income. Following tax certiorari proceedings commenced in July 2017 (Sup Ct, Broome County, Index No. EFCA2017001704) and September 2017 (Sup Ct, Broome County, Index No. EFCA2016001729), petitioners and respondents Town of Harford and Assessor for the Town of Harford (the Town Assessor) executed a court-approved settlement agreement (the settlement agreement) which provided, in accordance with RPTL 727, that the subject property's assessment would be maintained at $500,000 through 2020 except, as relevant herein, upon a town-wide revaluation.
In 2020, the Town of Harford undertook a town-wide revaluation. The Town Assessor did not use the income capitalization valuation methodology specified for income-based affordable housing properties by RPTL 581-a but, rather, valued the property
at its market value. Petitioners contend that the assessor's failure to use the applicable valuation methodology upon revaluation constituted a clerical error subject to correction pursuant to article 5 of the RPTL. Accordingly, in January 2021, Creamery applied to Laura Fox, the Cortland County Director of Real Property Tax Services (the County Tax Director), for correction of the tax roll pursuant to RPTL 554. On January 29, 2021, the County Tax Director denied the application based on petitioners’ failure to submit income documentation...
To continue reading
Request your trial