Crecelius v. New Albany Mach. Mfg. Co.
Citation | 4 F.2d 369 |
Decision Date | 27 February 1925 |
Docket Number | No. 3336.,3336. |
Parties | CRECELIUS et al. v. NEW ALBANY MACH. MFG. CO. |
Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
Frank C. Dailey, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellants.
Paul Y. Davis, of Indianapolis, Ind., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and PAGE, Circuit Judges.
This appeal is to reverse a decree of the United States District Court of Indiana, enjoining appellants, here called defendants, from removing railway tracks, etc., belonging to the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, here called railway company, constructed and operated upon property in which appellee, here called plaintiff, claimed and was decreed to have an easement. Instruments, relating to the alleged easement, which for brevity will be called A and B, are hereinafter set out.
The original defendant, Elizabeth Barth, now deceased, the grantee in A, and the present defendants, her children and heirs at law, were citizens of and resided in Indiana. The original plaintiff, Jane De Pauw Gates, a daughter of Newland T. De Pauw, the president of the grantor in A and the principal grantor in B, was a citizen and resident of the state of Kentucky. Newland T. De Pauw died in 1913, and through his will and by purchase from her sister Jane De Pauw Gates became the owner of the fee to certain premises owned by said Newland T. De Pauw, and which were, at the time of the making of A and B, and at the time Jane De Pauw Gates obtained her title thereto, occupied by the grantor in A, New Albany Manufacturing Company, under a lease, from year to year, from Newland T. De Pauw. By her father's will and by purchase from her sister, Jane De Pauw Gates became the owner of 420 shares of the capital stock of the New Albany Manufacturing Company, owned by Newland T. De Pauw at the time of the execution of A and B, and at the time of his death. The remaining 220 shares were not owned by him, and there is no allegation as to their ownership.
The bill alleges that on April 1, 1915, the New Albany Manufacturing Company, the grantor in A, together with plaintiff, leased the tract of land occupied by the New Albany Manufacturing Company to one Henry H. Martin, to be used and occupied by him as a manufacturing plant, and alleges that it was so occupied at the commencement of the suit. It is further alleged: That De Pauw and the New Albany Manufacturing Company desired to provide, increase, and improve the facilities of the New Albany Manufacturing Company for receiving coal, etc., and that Elizabeth Barth also desired a side track for the August Barth Leather Company, a corporation in which she was interested. That to carry out those desires A was executed, as follows:
(Foregoing deed was dated April 3, 1903, and recorded June 4, 1904.)
That on the same date Elizabeth Barth, the original defendant, for a consideration passing to her from De Pauw, further agreed to grant, and did then and there grant and convey, to the New Albany Manufacturing Company, the grantor in A, and to the railway company the right to lay the switch in question. Then follows the averment:
(Foregoing deed was dated April 3, 1903, and recorded June 11, 1904.)
It is further alleged that "shortly after the execution of said agreements, deeds of conveyance, and writings hereinbefore set out" the railway company constructed and laid down the proposed switch and track connecting the said tract of land so occupied by the New Albany Manufacturing Company and owned by the said Newland T. De Pauw with...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Grady v. Irvine
...v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., D.C.D. Mass., 2 F.R.D. 167; Small v. Frick, D.C.E.D.S.C., 40 F.Supp. 778; Crecelius v. New Albany Mach. Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 4 F.2d 369; Cohen v. Maryland Casualty Co. of Baltimore, D.C.E.D.S.C., 4 F.2d 564; Atwood v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 1 Cir.,......
-
Long v. Horton
...will be clear and irresistible on the face of the deed that a life estate only was intended." In the case of Crecelius v. New Albany Mach. Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 4 F.2d 369, 372, it was held that the use of the words, "conveys and warrants', as used in the quoted statutes creates a conveyance in......