CREEK POINTE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCATION, INC. v. Harp
| Decision Date | 15 August 2002 |
| Docket Number | No. 578P01.,578P01. |
| Citation | 356 N.C. 161,568 S.E.2d 191 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | CREEK POINTE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCATION, INC. and Kenneth C. Kremer, Plaintiffs v. Richard HARP, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff v. Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Company, Inc., Third-Party Defendant. |
Charles K. McCotter, Jr., New Bern, for Harp.
C. David Creech, New Bern, for Creek Pointe HOA and Kremer.
Gary H. Clemmons, New Bern, for Weyerhaeuser Real Estate Co.
Prior report: 146 N.C.App. 159, 552 S.E.2d 220.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff (Richard Harp) in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 15th day of August 2002."
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
Coker v. Daimlerchrysler Corp.
...N.C.App. 159, 164, 552 S.E.2d 220, 224-25 (2001) (whether a complainant has standing is a question of law), disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 161, 568 S.E.2d 191 (2002). Our review of the Business Court's order is de novo. Fuller v. Easley, 145 N.C.App. 391, 395, 553 S.E.2d 43, 46 (2001); Falk In......
-
Time Warner Entertainment Advance/Newhouse Partnership v. Town of Landis
...(2006) (quoting Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. Happ, 146 N.C.App. 159, 164, 552 S.E.2d 220, 225 (2001), disc. rev. denied, 356 N.C. 161, 568 S.E.2d 191 (2002)). The predicate facts necessary to constitute a controversy are distinguishable from those required to support a party's standing......
-
Bailey and Associates v. Bd. of Adjustment
...controversy." Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. Happ, 146 N.C.App. 159, 164, 552 S.E.2d 220, 225 (2001), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 161, 568 S.E.2d 191 (2002) (quoting Town of Ayden v. Town of Winterville, 143 N.C.App. 136, 544 S.E.2d 821 (2001); Town of Pine Knoll Shores v. Carolina Wat......
-
Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.
...controversy." Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. Happ, 146 N.C.App. 159, 164, 552 S.E.2d 220, 225 (2001), disc. review denied, 356 N.C. 161, 568 S.E.2d 191 (2002). According to Defendant, Plaintiff Moody had no justiciable claim to prosecute as of 16 December 2004 because he agreed, pursuant......
Request a trial to view additional results