Creekmore v. Public Belt Railroad Commission

Decision Date30 March 1943
Docket NumberNo. 10552.,10552.
Citation134 F.2d 576
PartiesCREEKMORE v. PUBLIC BELT RAILROAD COMMISSION OF NEW ORLEANS et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

Martin F. O'Donoghue, of Washington, D. C., Bentley G. Byrnes, of New Orleans, La., and James J. Farnan, of South Bend, Ind., for appellant.

Alfred C. Kammer, of New Orleans, La., for appellees.

Before SIBLEY, HOLMES, and McCORD, Circuit Judges.

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

Action was brought against the Public Belt Railroad Commission of New Orleans and the City of New Orleans to recover additional compensation, liquidated damages, and attorneys' fees under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201-219. The suit was filed on behalf of five railway maintenance employees who had been paid wages of 30¢ per hour after the promulgation and issuance of a wage order fixing a minimum wage rate of 36¢ per hour for the railroad carrier industry.

The City of New Orleans and the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. After a hearing the court dismissed the complaint, holding that the City of New Orleans is a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana; that the Public Belt Railroad Commission is a department of the City; and that the employer-employee relationship involved is within the exclusion of Section 3(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act: "(d) `Employer' includes any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee but shall not include the United States or any State or political subdivision of a State * * *."

The five employees named in the complaint work for the Public Belt Railroad in New Orleans. The City of New Orleans owns, controls, and operates the railroad by and through one of its departments, the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans. Davis v. New Orleans Public Belt R. R., 155 La. 504, 99 So. 419, 31 A.L.R. 1303; Solomon v. City of New Orleans, 156 La. 629, 101 So. 1; Higginbotham v. Public Belt Railroad Commission, 192 La. 525, 526, 188 So. 395. The City of New Orleans is a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana. State v. Coulon, 197 La. 1058, 3 So. 2d 241; State v. Maitrejean, 193 La. 824, 192 So. 361.

The exclusion provision of Section 3(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act is couched in plain and unambiguous language and should be given effect as it is written. Appellant strongly contends, however, that because of the remedial nature of the Act it was the legislative intent to include within its coverage employees such as those working for the Public Belt Railroad Commission for the City of New Orleans; that in operating the railroad the City of New Orleans acts in a purely proprietary capacity; and that employees of the railroad should be within the coverage of the Act.

In construing the Act the duty of the Court is to determine what employers and employees are within its coverage, not what employees "should" have been covered, for the question of who "should" be covered is a matter solely within the province of the legislative...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Feary v. Regional Transit Authority
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • May 18, 1988
    ...662 (1974). 22 Kel-Kan Investment Corp. v. Village of Greenwood, 428 So.2d 401, 405 (La.1983); see Creekmore v. Public Belt Railroad Commission of New Orleans, 134 F.2d 576, 577 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 742, 64 S.Ct. 43, 88 L.Ed. 440 (1943). See generally La. Const. art. 6 (1974);......
  • Bloomfield Steamship Co. v. Sabine Pilots Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • February 14, 1959
    ...v. Ogilvie Hardware Co., 5 Cir., 155 F.2d 577, affirmed 330 U.S. 709, 67 S.Ct. 997, 91 L.Ed. 1192; Creekmore v. Public Belt Railroad Commission of New Orleans, 5 Cir., 134 F.2d 576. Perhaps the clearest statement of this principle is by the Supreme Court itself in United States v. Public Ut......
  • Hays v. Republic Steel Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • May 24, 1976
    ...v. Federal Power Commission, 156 F.2d 949 (CA 5 1946), aff'd, 331 U.S. 682, 67 S.Ct. 1482, 91 L.Ed. 1742 (1947); Creekmore v. Public Belt R.R. Commission, 134 F.2d 576 (CA 5), cert. denied, 320 U.S. 742, 64 S.Ct. 43, 88 L.Ed. 440 (1943). There is nothing in the ADEA or its legislative histo......
  • Walling v. New Orleans Private Patrol Service
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • August 7, 1944
    ...officers of the City of New Orleans, which is a political subdivision of the State of Louisiana (Creekmore v. Public Belt R. Commission of New Orleans et al., 5 Cir., 1943, 134 F.2d 576), are not employees of said City. Walling v. Sanders, 6 Cir., 1943, 136 F.2d 78; Act, Sec. 3(d, e), 29 U.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT