Crest Finance Co v. United States, 325
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM |
| Citation | Crest Finance Co v. United States, 368 U.S. 347, 82 S.Ct. 384, 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961) |
| Decision Date | 18 December 1961 |
| Docket Number | No. 325,325 |
| Parties | CREST FINANCE CO., Inc. v. UNITED STATES |
Edmund L. Jones, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Oberdorfer, Wayne G. Barnett, Joseph Kovner and George F. Lynch, for the United States.
Benjamin M. Nathan and Theodore M. Newman, for National Commercial Finance Conference, Inc., as amicus curiae.
On petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
In the light of the Solicitor General's concession that petitioner's lien is choate, and the Court agreeing therewith, certioari is granted, the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
George W. Ultch Lumber Co. v. Hall Plastering, Inc.
...against third party creditors. See United States v. Crest Finance Co., 302 F.2d 568, 569 (7th Cir. 1962), on remand from 368 U.S. 347, 82 S.Ct. 384, 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961); cf. United States v. New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 84, 74 S.Ct. 367, 98 L.Ed. 520 (1954). Any perfected or exempted "securit......
-
United States v. State of Vermont
...(1960); United States v. Durham Lumber Co., 363 U.S. 522, 80 S.Ct. 1282, 4 L.Ed.2d 1371 (1960); and Crest Finance Co. v. United States, 368 U.S. 347, 82 S.Ct. 384, 7 L.Ed.2d 342 (1961), but do not consider them relevant here. 9 The actual decision in that case is not relevant to our problem......
-
United States v. Marion 8212 19
... ... P. 325—326 ... Reversed ... R. Kent Greenawalt, New York ... ...
-
Florida East Coast Railway Company v. United States
... ... Brown Shoe adopts these criteria (370 U.S. at 325-326, 82 S.Ct. at 1524): ... Product Market ... " The outer boundaries of a product market are ... ...