Cripe Baking Co. v. City of Bethany, Mo.
| Citation | 64 F.2d 755 |
| Decision Date | 03 April 1933 |
| Docket Number | No. 9500.,9500. |
| Parties | CRIPE BAKING CO. v. CITY OF BETHANY, MO., et al. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit) |
Floyd M. Sprague, of St. Joseph, Mo. (Charles H. Mayer, Roscoe P. Conkling, and Mayer, Conkling & Sprague, all of St. Joseph, Mo., on the brief), for appellant.
C. C. Ross, of Bethany, Mo., for appellees.
Before STONE, VAN VALKENBURGH, and BOOTH, Circuit Judges.
This is an action by appellant to enjoin enforcement of an ordinance of the city of Bethany, Mo. From a decree denying injunction this appeal is brought.
The city of Bethany, Mo., enacted an ordinance, the part here essential being as follows: "Every person, firm, company or corporation engaged in selling or delivering said goods or merchandise of any kind at wholesale or retail, to any firm, person or corporation in the City of Bethany, Missouri, shall pay a license fee at the rate of $2.00 per day, or $30.00 per month or $125.00 per six months or $200.00 per year; provided that this section shall not apply to any person, firm, company or corporation selling at their regular established places of business in the city."
The appellant manufactures bread on a large scale at its plant in St. Joseph, Mo., and sells the product to retailers in adjoining towns, making daily deliveries thereof by truck. It has been serving several customers in the city of Bethany without paying the license fee required by the ordinance. No question is made that it comes within the provisions of the ordinance. The bases of this action are, first, that the ordinance violates the Fourteenth Amendment, and, second, that it was beyond the power of this city, under the state law governing its powers, to enact an ordinance of this character applicable to the kind of business being done by appellant.
We find it unnecessary to discuss the first ground of attack upon the ordinance since the decree must be reversed and an injunction ordered because the second ground, above, is sound.
The city of Bethany is organized as a city of the fourth class under general statutes of the state of Missouri. It has only such powers as are granted to it by the Constitution and statutes of that state. Its powers to levy occupation license taxes are primarily governed by two sections of the Missouri statutes. One of these is section 7287, Revised Statutes of Missouri 1929 (Mo. St. Ann. § 7287), which, in part, provides: "No municipal corporation in this state shall have the power to impose a license tax upon any business avocation, pursuit or calling, unless such business avocation, pursuit or calling is specially named as taxable in the charter of such municipal corporation, or unless such power be conferred by statute."
The other is section 7046, Revised Statutes 1929 (Mo. St. Ann. § 7046), which is entitled "Power to license, tax and regulate certain businesses and occupations." This section contains an extended enumeration of businesses and occupations which are subject to such taxation.
In the case of Campbell Baking Company v. City of Harrisonville, Missouri, 50 F.(2d) 670, this court had before it an ordinance and a situation like those here involved. In passing upon the point now under consideration here, this court held that, under the wording and judicial construction by the Supreme Court of Missouri, section 7287 denied the exercise of such taxing power unless clearly granted but that, within the enumeration of businesses and occupations in section 7046 as we deemed that section construed by decisions of the Supreme Court of Missouri, the power to levy the character of tax there and here involved was granted under the designation (in the section) of "merchants of all kinds." Judge Van Valkenburgh dissented from the conclusion as to section 7046. Since the Campbell Baking Company decision the Supreme Court of Missouri has decided to the contrary in the recent case of City of Ozark v. Hammond, 49 S.W.(2d) 129. It is our duty to accept and follow the construction thus placed upon this section by the Supreme Court of the state. The obvious result is that the ordinance here involved is invalid...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Lockhart
... ... petitioner ... (1) The ... authority of the City of St. Louis to impose license taxes ... upon businesses and avocations ... Strodtman, 18 S.W.2d 896, 323 Mo. 161; ... Nafziger Baking Co. v. Salisbury, 48 S.W.2d 563, 329 ... Mo. 1014; City of Ozark v ... Joslyn, 58 S.W.2d 288, reversed 44 S.W.2d 258; Cripe ... Baking Co. v. Bethany, 64 F.2d 755. (2) Ordinance No ... 42217 ... ...
-
Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. City of St. Louis
...of Lebanon v. Joslyn, 58 S.W.2d 289; Pierce City v. Hentschel, 210 S.W. 31; Campbell Baking Co. v. Maryville, 31 F.2d 466; Cripe Baking Co. v. Bethany, 64 F.2d 755. (g) conferred upon a municipality cannot be enlarged by liberal construction. Instead enumeration of powers granted operates t......
-
Ward Baking Co. v. City of Ste. Genevieve
... ... take the profit earned.'" [See, also, City of ... Lebanon v. Joslyn (Mo.), 58 S.W.2d 289; Cripe Baking ... Co. v. City of Bethany, 64 F.2d 755.] And, quoting ... further from the Hammond case: " ... [119 S.W.2d 294] ... of course, the ... ...
-
Food Center of St. Louis v. Village of Warson Woods
...all purposes. Campbell Baking Co. v. City of Harrisonville, 8 Cir., 50 F.2d 670, 675, overruled on other grounds; Cripe Baking Co. v. City of Bethany, 8 Cir., 64 F.2d 755. A tax when measured on the gross receipts or volume of business is not an ad valorem tax but is an occupation or privil......