Criswell v. Best Western Intern., Inc., 94-629
| Decision Date | 10 May 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 94-629,94-629 |
| Citation | 636 So.2d 562 |
| Parties | 19 Fla. L. Weekly D1041 Richard CRISWELL, Petitioner, v. BEST WESTERN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Robert C. Wilcox, Waterford Management Company, Inc., and Van Auken Miller, AIA, Respondents. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Harry James Averell, Dania, and Douglas H. Stein, Miami, for petitioner.
Cooney, Haliczer, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Pettis & Richards and Victor Lance and Pamela R. Kittrell, Fort Lauderdale, for respondent Wilcox.
Before BASKIN, JORGENSON and GREEN, JJ.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
Plaintiff Richard Criswell petitions for a writ of certiorari to quash an order of the trial court denying his motion to compel discovery. We grant the petition, quash the order and remand with instructions to grant petitioner's motion to compel discovery.
Criswell filed an action against Best Western International, Inc., Robert Wilcox, Waterford Management Company, Inc., Van Auken Miller, AIA, [collectively "defendants"] seeking damages for injuries Criswell suffered when he fell down a stairwell on Best Western's premises. Criswell asserted that the stairwell was negligently constructed and maintained. During the course of discovery, Criswell served defendants with requests to produce 1 and interrogatories 2 designed to elicit information regarding accidents on the stairwell subsequent to the date of Criswell's fall. Criswell sought the information to prove his negligent construction case. The defendants objected to these requests on the grounds that they were irrelevant and immaterial. Criswell moved to compel answers to these requests; the trial court denied the motion. Criswell seeks certiorari review.
According to Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097, 1098 (Fla.1987), "common law certiorari is an extraordinary remedy and should not be used to circumvent the interlocutory appeal rule which authorizes appeal from only a few types of non-final orders." However an order denying discovery will be reviewed by petition for writ of certiorari when the order will cause irreparable harm. Ruiz v. Steiner, 599 So.2d 196 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Carroll Contracting, Inc. v. Edwards, 528 So.2d 951, 953 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 536 So.2d 243 (Fla.1988). The matter before us presents such a case: plenary appeal will not afford Criswell adequate redress.
Here, as in Carroll Contracting, there is no substitute for the information Criswell seeks. Facts describing other accidents on the stairs where Criswell was injured can be obtained only from defendants, see Colonial Penn Ins. Co. v. Blair, 380 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), and on plenary appellate review, there would be no practical way of determining what information in defendants' possession would have been available to Criswell and no way of evaluating how the information would have affected the case. Ruiz; Travelers Indem. Co. v. Hill, 388 So.2d 648 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).
Moreover, although a trial court has broad discretion in denying discovery motions, American S. Co. v. Tinter, Inc., 565 So.2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), the order in this case exceeds that broad scope, and departs from the essential requirements of law. Contrary to defendant's assertion, the information Criswell seeks is neither irrelevant,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Riano v. Heritage Corp. of South Florida
...denial of the right to take testimony of an alleged material witness could not be remedied on appeal); Criswell v. Best Western Int'l Inc., 636 So.2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (petition granted because denial of motion to compel discovery involved information for which there was no substitute)......
-
Phillips v. Phillips
...Schiavo, 866 So.2d 136, 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Beekie v. Morgan, 751 So.2d 694, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) ; Criswell v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., 636 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). Id. at 1234-35 (emphasis added) (footnote omitted).Here, the order at issue denied the Wife discovery of inform......
-
Giacalone v. Helen Ellis Memorial Hosp.
...v. Schiavo, 866 So.2d 136, 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Beekie v. Morgan, 751 So.2d 694, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Criswell v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., 636 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994). DISCUSSION The primary claim on which Mr. Giacalone bases his defenses and counterclaims is that the charges f......
-
Anderson v. Meiden
...v. Schiavo, 866 So.2d 136, 140 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Beekie v. Morgan, 751 So.2d 694, 698 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000); Criswell v. Best W. Int'l, Inc., 636 So.2d 562, 563 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).Giacalone, 8 So.3d at 1234–35 (footnote omitted). Based on the specific facts of this case, we believe that And......
-
Certiorari Review of Orders Denying Discovery in Civil Cases.
...dealer submitted to manufacturer as request for warranty credit, in action apparently over defective truck); Criswell v. Best W. Int'l, 636 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) (reports of accidents on defendant's stairwell that took place after subject fall, as relevant to plaintiff's argument th......
-
Certiorari Review of Orders Denying Discovery in Civil Cases.
...(Fla. 1st DCA 2010); Giacalone v. Helen Ellis Mem'l Hosp. Found., 8 So. 3d 1232, 1234-35 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); Criswell v. Best W. Int'l, 636 So. 2d 562 (Fla. 3d DCA (49) Some that have: Verizon Bus. Network Servs. v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections, 960 So. 2d 916, 917 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); Royal C......