Crompton v. State

Citation728 So.2d 1188
Decision Date05 March 1999
Docket NumberNo. 98-3402.,98-3402.
PartiesRalph Edward CROMPTON, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appellant, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ralph Edward Crompton was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced pursuant to section 775.082(1), Florida Statutes (1995), to life imprisonment with no possibility of parole. He filed a rule 3.800(a) motion claiming that he is entitled to 283 days credit for time spent in the county jail prior to sentencing. The trial court denied the motion, stating that Crompton had already filed an identical motion, which the trial court had denied. It also concluded that because Crompton was serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole, the failure to award 283 days credit could not constitute an illegal sentence raisable in a rule 3.800(a) motion. The trial court did not attach a copy of the original motion or its order denying the motion.

Section 921.161(1), Florida Statutes (1995), requires that defendants receive credit for all of the time spent in the county jail before sentence. The statute and case law do not qualify that this provision is not applicable to those serving life sentences without the possibility of parole. The failure to award jail credit for time served before sentencing constitutes an illegal sentence. See State v. Mancino, 714 So.2d 429 (Fla.1998)

.

Appellant's motion, however, fails the pleading requirements of Mancino and Baker v. State, 714 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). Therefore, we affirm the trial court's denial of appellant's rule 3.800(a) motion, but we do so without prejudice to appellant's ability to file a properly pled rule 3.800(a) motion in the trial court. See Combs v. State, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D260a, 723 So.2d 931 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)

.

ERVIN, ALLEN and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Barnishin v. State, 1D05-0608.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2006
    ...that any person sentenced must receive credit for all time spent in jail prior to the imposition of sentence. See Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("The failure to award jail credit for time served before sentencing constitutes an illegal sentence."). But the prec......
  • CREGG v. State of Fla.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • August 25, 2010
    ...the date DOC received 43 So.3d 820 the arrest warrant and the date he was sentenced on the new charges. See generally Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188, 1189 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) ("The failure to award jail credit for time served before sentencing constitutes an illegal We note initially tha......
  • Hampton v. State, 99-02809.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 10, 1999
    ...records demonstrate on their face an entitlement to relief. See Spivey v. State, 737 So.2d 604 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). If Hampton files such a motion, the circuit court should consult Hampton's court file and his jail records in determinin......
  • Turner v. State, 1D00-278.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 16, 2000
    ...(in Anders appeal, remanding with directions to conform written probationary order to oral pronouncement). And see Crompton v. State, 728 So.2d 1188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (failure to award jail credit on life sentence without possibility of parole constituted an illegal sentence). Appellant n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT