Crook v. Bartlett
Decision Date | 15 October 1913 |
Citation | 155 Ky. 305,159 S.W. 826 |
Parties | CROOK, County Clerk, v. BARTLETT. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Anderson County.
Petition by Wallace M. Bartlett for a mandatory injunction requiring J. H. Crook, County Clerk, to print ballots to be used by female voters in the election for county school superintendent. Injunction was granted, and defendant moves in the Court of Appeals to dissolve it. Motion denied.
James Garnett, Atty. Gen., and Frank L. Ripy, of Lawrenceburg, for appellant.
W. P Marsh, of Lawrenceburg, for appellee.
This proceeding was instituted by a petition filed in the Anderson circuit court seeking a mandatory injunction, requiring the county clerk to print ballots to be used by the female voters in the election for county school superintendent of Anderson county. The circuit court granted the injunction and a motion has been entered before me to dissolve it. The whole court sat with me in determining the motion.
By the act approved March 12, 1912, it is provided as follows:
At the same session of the General Assembly, by an act approved March 18, 1912, it is provided as follows:
The solution of the questions involved turns on the proper construction of these acts, and their effect under the provisions of the Constitution. The conclusions of a majority of the court are as follows:
1. By the act of March 18, 1912, the county superintendent shall be elected by the qualified voters of each county qualified to vote in all school elections at the regular November election. What the Legislature meant by voters qualified to vote in all school elections is to be determined by reading the act of March 12th in connection with this act; for the rule is well settled that the acts of the same Assembly are to be read together. By the act of March 12th all women possessing the legal qualifications of male voters in any common school election, and who in addition are able to read and write, shall be qualified to vote at all elections for school trustees and other school officers required to be elected by the people, and upon all school measures submitted to a vote of the people. Women possessing these qualifications are qualified voters of the county qualified to vote in all school elections within the meaning of the act of March 18, 1912. The two acts therefore, when read together, make women possessing the necessary qualifications qualified voters to vote for county superintendent, if this construction does not violate some provision of the Constitution. It is provided by the act of March 12th that the act shall not apply to any election the qualifications of the voters at which are otherwise prescribed by the Constitution, nor to any office as to which the Constitution otherwise prescribes the qualifications of persons eligible thereto. So the question is: Had the Legislature the power to confer on women the right to vote for school superintendent?
2. By section 145 of the Constitution, the qualifications of voters are prescribed and only male citizens possessing these qualifications are entitled to vote. By sections 147 and 148 only one election a year is to be held. This is to be held on the first Monday in November between the hours of 6 o'clock a. m. and 7...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Zuckerman v. Bevin
...authorized women to vote in elections for county school superintendents, as authorized by Ky. Const. § 155. Crook v. Bartlett , 155 Ky. 305, 159 S.W. 826 (1913).18 Section 2 of the Norris-LaGuardia Act contains a broad declaration of public policy and of the need to protect workers in joini......
-
Prewitt v. Wilson
...citizens shall not apply to the elections of school trustees, and gives the Legislature plenary power in respect thereto. Crook v. Bartlett, 155 Ky. 305, 159 S.W. 826. question before us is whether this statute in its fullness still stands. The Nineteenth Amendment, which was proclaimed on ......
-
Prewitt v. Wilson
...citizens shall not apply to the elections of school trustees, and gives the Legislature plenary power in respect thereto. Crook v. Bartlett, 155 Ky. 305, 159 S.W. 826. The before us is whether this statute in its fullness still stands. The Nineteenth Amendment, which was proclaimed on Augus......
-
Stuessy v. City of Louisville
...to vote for officers other than school trustees, and at elections other than common school district elections. In Crook v. Bartlett, 155 Ky. 305, 159 S.W. 826, considered, at some length, the effect of the act of 1912, extending the right to vote to women on school questions, and held that ......