Crook v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.
Decision Date | 16 February 1993 |
Citation | 81 N.Y.2d 807,595 N.Y.S.2d 388 |
Parties | , 611 N.E.2d 289 Cheryl CROOK et al., Appellants, v. E.I. DUPONT de NEMOURS & COMPANY, et al., Defendants, National Chemsearch, Division of N.C.H. Corp., et al., Respondents. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (181 A.D.2d 1039, 582 N.Y.S.2d 581).
HANCOCK, J., took no part.
To continue reading
Request your trial17 cases
-
Seavey v. Chrysler Corp.
...CPLR § 1003 is "a jurisdictional defect" requiring dismissal of all claims against that party. Crook v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 81 N.Y.2d 807, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 611 N.E.2d 289 (1993), aff'g 181 A.D.2d 1039, 582 N.Y.S.2d 581 (4th Dep't 1992). In light of the Crook decision, Justice Le......
-
Perez v. Paramount Communications, Inc.
...permission, and noncompliance renders the pleadings jurisdictionally defective (see, CPLR 1003; Crook v. E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 81 N.Y.2d 807, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 611 N.E.2d 289, affg. 181 A.D.2d 1039, 582 N.Y.S.2d 581; Ospina v. Vimm Corp., 203 A.D.2d 440, 610 N.Y.S.2d 574; Dauernhei......
- Kelley v. Schneck
-
Martin v. Witkowski
...defect that requires dismissal, even if the affected service is otherwise compliant with law (see Crook v. D upont de Nemours Co., 81 N.Y.2d 807, 809, 595 N.Y.S.2d 388, 611 N.E.2d 289 [1993], affg on op below [appeal No. 2] 181 A.D.2d 1039, 582 N.Y.S.2d 581 [4th Dept. 1992] ). Junior, howev......
Request a trial to view additional results