Crowder v. State
Decision Date | 01 June 1901 |
Citation | 63 S.W. 669,69 Ark. 330 |
Parties | CROWDER v. STATE |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from White Circuit Court, HANCE N. HUTTON, Judge.
Judgment affirmed.
J. P Roberts, for appellant.
Under the constitution a justice of the peace has jurisdiction over misdemeanors committed in any township of his county, Const Ark. art. 7, § 40. Cf. 35 Ark. 327. The jurisdiction of the justice was concurrent with that of the circuit court and his judgment was a bar to further prosecution. 34 Ark. 188. & H. Dig., § 2343, restricting pleas of guilty in misdemeanor cases to justice courts of the township where the offense was committed, is unconstitutional. Art. 7, § 40, Const. Ark.; 5 Ark. 534; 7 Ark. 173; 14 Ark. 545; 2 Ark. 440.
Jeff Davis, Attorney General, and Chas. Jacobson, for appellee.
The plea of guilty should have been before a justice of the township where the offense was committed. Sand. & H. Dig., § 2343.
This is an indictment for gaming. There was a plea of former conviction, verdict of guilty, and judgment and sentence accordingly, from which the defendant appeals, after motion for new trial filed and overruled. The plea of former conviction is as follows, to-wit: The following judgment was entered by said justice of the peace, to-wit: "Now on this the 13th day of January, 1900, comes H. A. Crowder, and enters his plea of guilty to gaming by playing "poker" in White county, Arkansas, on the 9th day of December, 1899, whereupon the court assessed a fine against him for said offense for $ 10, and, having no constable in Negro Hill township, said fine is charged against H. A. Crowder, constable of Red River township, in White county." It thus appears that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Williams
... ... hear the evidence, accepting the plea of defendant and ... instructing the jury to return a verdict and fix the penalty ... Sec. 3247, R. S. 1919; Wartner v. State, 102 Ind ... 57; Lowery v. Howard, 103 Ind. 440; Koerner v ... State, 96 Ind. 243; Crowder v. State, 69 Ark ... 330; State v. Genz, 57 N. J. 459; Bell v ... State, 44 Ala. 9; Concemi v. People, 18 N.Y ... 128. The action of the court in this case was a denial to the ... defendant of due process of law, notwithstanding the fact ... that the accused made no objection. The ... ...
-
State v. Williams
...the penalty. Sec. 3247, R.S. 1919; Wartner v. State, 102 Ind. 57; Lowery v. Howard, 103 Ind. 440; Koerner v. State, 96 Ind. 243; Crowder v. State, 69 Ark. 330; State v. Genz, 57 N.J. 459; Bell v. State, 44 Ala. 9; Concemi v. People, 18 N.Y. 128. The action of the court in this case was a de......
- Craighead v. Farmers' Building & Loan Association
-
State v. Ketchum
... ... offender and for all costs incurred, as in the procedure in ... other cases of misdemeanor." And such judgment is made a ... bar to another prosecution for the [113 Ark. 71] same ... offense. The sections just cited were construed in the case ... of Crowder v. State, 69 Ark. 330, 63 S.W ... 669, and it was there said: "In our view of it, these ... statutes were enacted for the purpose of preventing frauds ... upon the laws in the cases of misdemeanors, and are not ... restrictions upon the jurisdiction generally of justices of ... the peace to ... ...