Crowley Marine Associates v. Nyconn Associates, LP

Decision Date04 March 2002
Citation292 A.D.2d 334,738 N.Y.S.2d 681
PartiesCROWLEY MARINE ASSOCIATES, Appellant,<BR>v.<BR>NYCONN ASSOCIATES, L.P., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ritter, J.P., Smith, Krausman and Townes, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

This action involves the sale of commercial real estate. The plaintiff, asserting causes of action sounding in fraud and breach of contract, alleged that the defendant seller falsely represented that the property taxes on the property were $14,000 annually when in fact they exceeded $22,000 annually.

The cause of action to recover damages for fraud must be dismissed. It is essentially one to recover damages for breach of contract, since the alleged false representation was set forth in a rider to the contract of sale. Merely alleging scienter in a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract, unless the representations alleged to be false are collateral or extraneous to the terms of the agreement, does not convert a breach of contract cause of action into one sounding in fraud (see, Weitz v Smith, 231 AD2d 518; Jackson Hgts. Med. Group v Complex Corp., 222 AD2d 409; Americana Petroleum Corp. v Northville Indus. Corp., 200 AD2d 646, 647-648). Therefore, the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for fraud.

The plaintiff also failed to state a cause of action to recover damages for breach of contract. Title to the property had closed and the deed was delivered. Therefore, any claims the plaintiff might have had arising from the contract of sale were extinguished by the doctrine of merger unless there was a "clear intent evidenced by the parties that a particular provision [of the contract of sale] shall survive the delivery of the deed" (Davis v Weg, 104 AD2d 617, 619; see, Dourountoudakis v Alesi, 271 AD2d 640). The parties' intent is clear from the contract that they did not intend the property tax provision to survive the closing.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Rojas v. Paine
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 12, 2012
    ...619;[101 A.D.3d 847]Ka Foon Lo v. Curis, 29 A.D.3d 525, 526, 815 N.Y.S.2d 131; [956 N.Y.S.2d 85]Crowley Mar. Assoc. v. Nyconn Assoc., 292 A.D.2d 334, 335, 738 N.Y.S.2d 681;Noufrios v. Murat, 193 A.D.2d 791, 792, 598 N.Y.S.2d 82;Davis v. Weg, 104 A.D.2d 617, 619, 479 N.Y.S.2d 553). Thus, spe......
  • Lunal Realty Llc v. Disanto Realty Llc
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 4, 2011
    ...( Ka Foon Lo v. Curis, 29 A.D.3d 525, 526, 815 N.Y.S.2d 131 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Crowley Mar. Assoc. v. Nyconn Assoc., 292 A.D.2d 334, 335, 738 N.Y.S.2d 681; Noufrios v. Murat, 193 A.D.2d 791, 792, 598 N.Y.S.2d 82; Davis v. Weg, 104 A.D.2d 617, 619, 479 N.Y.S.2d 553). The......
  • TIAA Global Invs., LLC v. One Astoria Square LLC, 652907/12, 13243
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 3, 2015
    ...in a contract that is later breached (see Ka Foon Lo, 29 A.D.3d at 526, 815 N.Y.S.2d 131 ; Crowley Mar. Assoc. v. Nyconn Assoc., 292 A.D.2d 334, 334, 738 N.Y.S.2d 681 [2d Dept.2002] ). However, as plaintiff points out, it has alleged fraud arising not merely from contractual promises to per......
  • Harris v. Golan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • February 17, 2022
    ... ... closing, citing to Crowley Marine Associates v Nyconn ... Associates, L.P., 292 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT