Crump v. Perryman
Citation | 193 S.W.2d 233 |
Decision Date | 25 January 1946 |
Docket Number | No. 13663.,13663. |
Parties | CRUMP et ux. v. PERRYMAN et al. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas |
Appeal from District Court, Grayson County; Jesse F. Holt, Judge.
Suit by H. B. Perryman and others against A. R. Crump and wife for injunction enjoining defendants from violating certain restrictive covenants contained in a prior instrument of dedication executed by owners of land comprising an addition to City of Dennison. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.
Affirmed.
Harry E. Kain, of Denison, for appellants.
O. H. Woodrow, of Sherman, for appellees.
The suit of appellees, Perryman and four other residents of Oakdale Addition to the City of Denison, was for temporary and final relief by way of injunction against A. R. Crump and wife, also lot owners; alleging the violation of certain restrictive covenants contained in a prior instrument of dedication executed by owners of the land comprising said addition. Following interlocutory order and upon trial to the court, a judgment of final injunction was rendered prohibiting appellants from erecting a garage apartment upon the rear of their lot before building a permanent residence; from which record of proceedings and order this appeal is taken.
No complaint is made of insufficiency of evidence to support above rendition; and as the judgment of District Judge Holt embodies all material facts incident thereto, same are here quoted inclusive of his conclusions of law:
Appellants' grounds of appeal are three in number, recited...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Moore v. Pettus, 3 Div. 649
...But such right or power as is thus granted is mrely cumulative of that already possessed by a property owner. Crump et ux. v. Perryman., Tax.Civ.App., 193 S.W.2d 233. The question has arisen in many states and the general rule is to the effect that a court of equity has jurisdiction to enjo......
-
Schmitz v. Denton Cnty. Cowboy Church
...redress from the violation. See Persons v. City of Fort Worth , 790 S.W.2d 865, 871 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1990, no writ) ; Crump v. Perryman , 193 S.W.2d 233, 236 (Tex. Civ. App.—Dallas 1946, no writ) (dictum); Eric M. Larsson, Cause of Action by Private Party to Enjoin Zoning Violation , 4......
-
Persons v. City of Fort Worth
...or injured other than as a member of the general public. Scott v. Board of Adjustment, 405 S.W.2d 55 (Tex.1966). The City cites Crump v. Perryman, 193 S.W.2d 233 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas 1946, no writ) as authority for applying the same standard regarding standing for seeking relief from an al......
-
Chandler v. Darwin
...See also Anderson v. Rowland, 18 Tex.Civ.App. 460, 44 S.W. 911; Lowrance v. Woods, 54 Tex.Civ.App. 233, 118 S.W. 551; Crump v. Perryman, Tex.Civ.App., 193 S.W.2d 233. Application of these familiar principles to the facts at hand sufficiently establishes the right of petitioners to the injun......