Crutchfield v. Wainwright
Decision Date | 19 December 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84-3508,84-3508 |
Citation | 779 F.2d 1466 |
Parties | Barney Earl CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Jim Smith, Respondents-Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit |
Thomas H. Bateman, III, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondents-appellants.
Gwendolyn Spivey, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; William Stafford, Chief Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion October 3, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 772 F.2d 839)
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.
A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Mebane, 13037
...In doing so, it stated that "[w]e hold that the test set forth in Crutchfield v. Wainwright, [772 F.2d 839, 843, vacated, 779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir.1985) (Crutchfield I ) ], and Chapman v. California, supra, is the appropriate one and that the burden [of demonstrating harmless error beyond a ......
-
State v. Mebane, 3811
...does not seem sufficiently likely to justify a rule of per se reversal." Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 772 F.2d 839, 842, vacated, 779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir.1985). Having interpreted the court's order as extending to the twenty-one minute recess only and having rejected the application of the ru......
- Zaklama v. Mount Sinai Medical Center
- Jackson v. Beard, 86-7382