Crutchfield v. Wainwright

Decision Date19 December 1985
Docket NumberNo. 84-3508,84-3508
Citation779 F.2d 1466
PartiesBarney Earl CRUTCHFIELD, Petitioner-Appellee, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Jim Smith, Respondents-Appellants.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit

Thomas H. Bateman, III, Dept. of Legal Affairs, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondents-appellants.

Gwendolyn Spivey, Tallahassee, Fla., for petitioner-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida; William Stafford, Chief Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion October 3, 1985, 11th Cir., 1985, 772 F.2d 839)

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs. The previous panel's opinion is hereby VACATED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • State v. Mebane, 13037
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 4 August 1987
    ...In doing so, it stated that "[w]e hold that the test set forth in Crutchfield v. Wainwright, [772 F.2d 839, 843, vacated, 779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir.1985) (Crutchfield I ) ], and Chapman v. California, supra, is the appropriate one and that the burden [of demonstrating harmless error beyond a ......
  • State v. Mebane, 3811
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • 1 July 1986
    ...does not seem sufficiently likely to justify a rule of per se reversal." Crutchfield v. Wainwright, 772 F.2d 839, 842, vacated, 779 F.2d 1466 (11th Cir.1985). Having interpreted the court's order as extending to the twenty-one minute recess only and having rejected the application of the ru......
  • Zaklama v. Mount Sinai Medical Center
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • 24 July 1990
  • Jackson v. Beard, 86-7382
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • 18 September 1987

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT