Cruz v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd.

Decision Date05 June 2007
Docket Number2007-00668.
Citation835 N.Y.S.2d 919,41 A.D.3d 417,2007 NY Slip Op 04775
PartiesVINCENT CRUZ, Appellant, v. MASADA AUTO SALES, LTD., et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order entered December 21, 2006 is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A motion for leave to reargue "shall be based on matters of fact or law allegedly overlooked or misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion, but shall not include matters of fact not offered on the prior motion" (CPLR 2221 [d] [2]; see Pryor v Commonwealth Land Tit. Ins. Co., 17 AD3d 434, 435-436 [2005]).

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, however, the defendants' motion for leave to reargue was not improperly based upon new arguments not previously advanced. Moreover, upon reargument, the Supreme Court properly vacated the order dated June 26, 2006 and properly granted that branch of the defendants' motion which was to deem them in compliance with the discovery order dated October 18, 2005.

Rivera, J.P., Spolzino, Fisher, Lifson and Dickerson, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Beach 104 St. Realty Inc. v. Kisslev-Mazel Realty LLC, 2009 NY Slip Op 32421 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 10/8/2009), 25569/07
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 8 d4 Outubro d4 2009
    ...the relevant facts" or "misapplied any controlling principle of law," in determining the prior motion. See, Cruz v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd., 41 A.D.3d 417 (2nd Dept. 2007); Collins v. Stone, 8 A.D.3d 321 (2nd Dept. 2004); Delgrosso v. 1325 Ltd. Partnership, 306 A.D.2d 241 (2nd Dept. 2003). ......
  • Codoner v. Bobby's Bus Co. Inc
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 30 d3 Junho d3 2010
    ...misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion." See, Everhart v. County of Nassau, 65 A.D.3d 1277; Cruz v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd., 41 A.D.3d 417 (2nd Dept. 2007); Collins v. Stone, 8 A.D.3d 321 (2nd Dept. 2004); Delgrosso v. 1325 Ltd. Partnership, 306 A.D.2d 241 (2nd Dept. 20......
  • Abarca v. Shoes
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 23 d5 Abril d5 2010
    ...misapprehended by the court in determining the prior motion." See, Everhart v. County of Nassau, 65 A.D.3d 1277; Cruz v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd., 41 A.D.3d 417 (2nd Dept. 2007); Collins v. Stone, 8 A.D.3d 321 (2nd Dept. 2004); Delgrosso v. 1325 Ltd. Partnership, 306 A.D.2d 241 (2nd Dept. 20......
  • Polanco v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, 2009 NY Slip Op 31582(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 7/13/2009)
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 13 d1 Julho d1 2009
    ...the relevant facts" or "misapplied any controlling principle of law," in determining the prior motion. Cruz v. Masada Auto Sales, Ltd., 41 A.D.3d 417 (2nd Dept. 2007); Collins v. Stone, 8 A.D.3d 321 (2nd Dept. 2004); Delgrosso v. 1325 Ltd. Partnership, 306 A.D.2d 241 (2nd Dept. 2003). The p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT