CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, S03Q1058.

Decision Date20 October 2003
Docket NumberNo. S03Q1058.,S03Q1058.
Citation588 S.E.2d 688,277 Ga. 248
PartiesCSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., et al. v. CITY of GARDEN CITY, et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Fulcher, Hagler, Reed, Hanks & Harper, James W. Purcell, Amy R. Snell, Augusta, for appellants.

Oliver, Maner & Gray, Patrick T. O'Connor, James P. Gerard, Christopher L. Ray, Paul H. Threlkeld, Brennan, Harris & Rominger, Edward R. Stabell, II, Savannah, for appellees.

Susan M. Pruett, Angela M. Nixon, Atlanta, Laurel E. Henderson, Decatur, Mullins, Whalen & Westbury, Andrew J. Whalen, III, Griffin, amici curiae.

HUNSTEIN, Justice.

This appeal involves certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.1 In 1996 Garden City entered into a series of agreements with CSX Transportation, Inc. and its affiliates to utilize a railroad right-of-way to install water and sewer lines. The agreements required Garden City to indemnify and hold harmless CSX or its subsidiaries for all liabilities CSX suffered in connection with the project and for which CSX was not the sole cause. The agreements also required Garden City to maintain insurance covering the indemnity obligations the City had assumed. In October 1997 a passenger train collided with a tractor trailer operated by Garden City's subcontractor causing CSX to incur substantial property damage and subjecting CSX to third-party claims. CSX sought indemnification from Garden City in accordance with the agreements. Garden City refused and CSX brought suit alleging that it was entitled to indemnification. The district court granted summary judgment to the City, finding that the indemnification provision constituted an impermissible waiver of the City's sovereign immunity in the absence of any evidence that the City had liability insurance to cover the indemnity claim. The Eleventh Circuit reversed and remanded to the trial court for its consideration of the effect of the City's participation in the Georgia Interlocal Risk Management Agency (GIRMA), a multi-government insurance fund. On remand, the district court again granted summary judgment to the City, finding that the indemnification agreements were ultra vires and that OCGA § 36-33-1(a) did not authorize the City to waive its immunity by entering into an indemnity contract. On appeal, the Eleventh Circuit certified to this Court the following questions:

(1) May a Georgia municipality contractually indemnify a private party for any and all loss, damage, and liability arising in connection with a public works project involving the private party's land? (2) if not, is there any loss, damage, or liability arising in connection with a public works project involving a private party's land for which a Georgia municipality may contractually indemnify the private party?

For the reasons that follow, we answer in the negative.

1. It is the general rule in Georgia that municipalities cannot exercise powers except those granted to them by the State and can be held liable upon contracts only when the State has authorized the incurring of the liability that is asserted against them. Kemp v. City of Claxton, 269 Ga. 173, 176(1), 496 S.E.2d 712 (1998) ("[m]unicipal corporations are creations of the state, possessing only those powers that have been granted to them, and allocations of power from the state are strictly construed. [Cit.]"); Screws v. City of Atlanta, 189 Ga. 839, 843(2), 8 S.E.2d 16 (1940) ("[w]hat can not be done by an ordinance can not be done by a contract"). See OCGA § 36-34-1 ("[i]t is declared to be the intention of the General Assembly to vest certain general powers in the governing body of each of the municipal corporations of this state"). Thus, the principal issue before us is whether Garden City was authorized to enter into an indemnification agreement with a private third party, thereby waiving its sovereign immunity.

The answer is controlled by specific legislative provisions authorizing the waiver of sovereign immunity. This Court has long recognized that sovereign immunity applies to all actions where the State or its departments or agencies is a party, see e.g., Gilbert v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 744(3), 452 S.E.2d 476 (1994), see also Youngblood v. Gwinnett Rockdale Newton Community Svc. Bd., 273 Ga. 715(2), 545 S.E.2d 875 (2001), and only the legislature has the authority to enact a law that specifically waives a municipality's sovereign immunity.2 Hiers v. City of Barwick, 262 Ga. 129(2), 414 S.E.2d 647 (1992). In the context of tort liability, the legislature has authorized a narrow waiver of a municipality's sovereign immunity through the enactment of OCGA § 36-33-1(a), which provides in part that:

Pursuant to Article IX, Section II, Paragraph IX of the Constitution of the State of Georgia, the General Assembly, except as provided in this Code section, declares it is the public policy of the State of Georgia that there is no waiver of the sovereign immunity of municipal corporations of the state and such municipal corporations shall be immune from liability for damages. A municipal corporation shall not waive its immunity by the purchase of liability insurance, except as provided in Code Section 33-24-51,3 or unless the policy of insurance issued covers an occurrence for which the defense of sovereign immunity is available, and then only to the extent of the limits of such insurance policy.4

Thus, as we have previously stated, any "waiver of sovereign immunity is a mere privilege, not a right, and the extension of that privilege is solely a matter of legislative grace. [Cit.]" Woodard v. Laurens County, 265 Ga. 404, 406(1), 456 S.E.2d 581 (1995).

Here, the indemnification agreements required the City to indemnify CSX for "all liability, loss, claim, suit, damage, charge, or expense which CSX may suffer, sustain, incur or in any way be subjected to ... except when caused solely by the fault or negligence of CSX." Because nothing in OCGA § 36-33-1 can be construed to permit a municipality to waive its sovereign immunity by contracting to indemnify a third party, the indemnification agreement between the City and CSX is void as an ultra vires contract. Newsome v. City of Union Point, 249 Ga. 434, 436, 291 S.E.2d 712 (1982) (municipal contract is ultra vires and void where it is beyond power or authority of local government to perform under any circumstances). See also Precise v. City of Rossville, 261 Ga. 210(1)...

To continue reading

Request your trial
36 cases
  • McElmurray v. Augusta-Richmond County
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • July 11, 2005
    ...452 S.E.2d 476. 31. Id. at 747-748(3), 452 S.E.2d 476. 32. Id. at 748, 452 S.E.2d 476. 33. See CSX Transp. v. City of Garden City, 277 Ga. 248, 250, n. 3, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003). 34. Donaldson, supra at 53(3), 414 S.E.2d 35. Curtis, supra at 228, 416 S.E.2d 510. 36. Mitchell, supra at 645(2)......
  • Mayor & Aldermen of Savannah v. Herrera
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 27, 2017
    ...of the Constitution itself. City of Atlanta v. Mitcham, 296 Ga. 576, 577 (1), 769 S.E.2d 320 (2015) ; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 277 Ga. 248, 249 (1), 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003) ; City of Greensboro v.Rowland, 334 Ga. App. 148, 149 (1), 778 S.E.2d 409 (2015). That immunity is reit......
  • Gravitt v. Olens
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 16, 2015
    ...211, 214, 719 S.E.2d 412 (2011) ; City of Atlanta v. Mitcham, 296 Ga. 576, 577, 769 S.E.2d 320 (2015) ; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 277 Ga. 248, 249, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003) ( “[T]he legislature has the authority to enact a law that specifically waives a municipality's sovereign......
  • Gatto v. City of Statesboro
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • October 21, 2019
    ...immunity unless waived by the General Assembly. Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. IX, Sec. II, Par. IX. See CSX Transp. v. City of Garden City , 277 Ga. 248, 250 (1), 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003) ("any waiver of sovereign immunity is a mere privilege, not a right, and the extension of that privilege is sol......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...Mercer L. Rev. 27 (1988); R. Perry Sentell, Jr., Local Government Tort Liability: The Summer of'92, 9 Ga. St. U. L. Rev. 405 (1993). 104. 277 Ga. 248, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003). 105. Id. at 248, 588 S.E.2d at 688. 106. Id. at 251, 588 S.E.2d at 690. The railroad sought indemnification from the ......
  • Administrative Law - Martin M. Wilson
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...Ga. App. at 584-85, 597 S.E.2d at 628. 89. Id. at 586, 597 S.E.2d at 629. 90. Id. 91. Id. 92. CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 277 Ga. 248, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003). 93. 277 Ga. 248, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003). 94. Id. at 248, 588 S.E.2d at 689. 95. Id. at 249, 588 S.E.2d at 689. 96. Id. 9......
  • Construction Law - Dennis J. Webb, Jr., Henry L. Balkcom Iv, and Dana R. Grantham
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 56-1, September 2004
    • Invalid date
    ...287. Smith, 265 Ga. App. at 59, 592 S.E.2d at 873. 288. Id. (citations omitted). 289. Id. 290. Id. at 60, 592 S.E.2d at 874. 291. Id. 292. 277 Ga. 248, 588 S.E.2d 688 (2003). 293. Id. at 248, 588 S.E.2d at 688-89. 294. Id. at 249-50, 588 S.E.2d at 689. 295. Id. at 249, 588 S.E.2d at 689 (ci......
  • V. Liability Under Igas
    • United States
    • Municipal Law Deskbook (ABA) Chapter 8 Intergovernmental Agreements
    • Invalid date
    ...No. 13-050, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87260 (W.D. La. June 20, 2013)).[149] . See, e.g., CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 588 S.E.2d 688 (Ga. 2003) (contract between municipality and plaintiff railroad could not waive city's sovereign immunity by indemnifying the railroad. Under Georgi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT