Cuellar v. State
| Decision Date | 03 December 1947 |
| Docket Number | No. 23821.,23821. |
| Citation | 206 S.W.2d 250 |
| Parties | CUELLAR v. STATE. |
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Cameron County; Arthur A. Klein, Judge.
Cosme Cuellar pleaded guilty to nighttime burglary of private residence and was sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for life and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Fred Kowalski, of Brownsville, for appellant.
Ernest S. Goens, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.
The indictment charged appellant with the nighttime burglary of the private residence of John E. Oaks. There was also a count charging a prior conviction of an offense of like character.
Appellant waived trial by jury and pleaded guilty before the court. The proceedings touching the entry and receipt of a plea of guilty before the court are regular. The trial court fixed appellant's punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for life. Neither the judgment nor sentence shows that the count charging a prior conviction entered into the punishment so fixed.
The statute (Art. 1391, P.C.) fixes the punishment for nighttime burglary of a private residence at confinement in the penitentiary for "any term not less than five years." This means that the punishment must be fixed at a term of years. Life imprisonment in the penitentiary is not for a term of years and is authorized only when the penalty fixed by statute so provides. See Ex parte Pruitt, 139 Tex.Cr.R. 438, 141 S.W.2d 333; Square v. State, 142 Tex.Cr.R. 493, 154 S.W.2d 852.
The court having fixed a punishment not authorized, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ex parte Davis
...S.W.2d 493; Ex Parte Whitten, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 169, 205 S.W.2d 588; Ex Parte Geisling, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 833 and Cuellar v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 176, 206 S.W.2d 250. The writer feels and believes that the correct disposition of this case is controlled by the case of Bailey v. United Stat......
-
Ex parte Hill, 50393
...v. State, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 303, 174 S.W.2d 493 (1943); Ex Parte Whitten, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 169, 205 S.W.2d 588 (1947); Cuellar v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 176, 206 S.W.2d 250 (1947); Ex Parte Castleberry, 152 Tex.Cr.R. 583, 216 S.W.2d 584 (1949); Ex Parte Geisling, 243 S.W.2d 833 (Tex.Cr.App.1951); Ex......
-
Ex parte Balas
...153, 306 S.W.2d 132; Ex Parte Goss, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 262 S.W.2d 412; Ex Parte Geisling, Tex.Cr.App., 243 S.W.2d 833; Cuellar v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 176, 206 S.W.2d 250; Ex Parte Whitten, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 169, 205 S.W.2d 588; Ex Parte Wheat, 146 Tex.Cr.R. 171, 172 S.W.2d 344; Ex Parte O'Dare......
-
Ex parte Foight, 29339
...S.W.2d 833; Ex parte Goss, 159 Tex.Cr.R. 235, 262 S.W.2d 412. See also Ex parte Rolen, Tex.Cr.App., 294 S.W.2d 403; Cuellar v. State, 151 Tex.Cr.R. 176, 206 S.W.2d 250; and Belton v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 286 S.W.2d The writ is granted and relator is ordered discharged from further confinemen......