Cullen v. Park Club Land Co.

Decision Date07 July 1919
Docket Number9449.
Citation184 P. 303,67 Colo. 210
PartiesCULLEN v. PARK CLUB LAND CO.
CourtColorado Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Oct. 6, 1919.

Error to District Court, City and County of Denver; John H Denison, Judge.

Action by the Park Club Land Company against Gertrude Cullen. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

H. A. Hicks, of Denver, for plaintiff in error.

W. H Malone and W. H. Malone, Jr., both of Denver (B. M. Malone of Denver, of counsel), for defendant in error.

BURKE J.

This was a suit by defendant in error against plaintiff in error (hereinafter designated as in the court below) upon a written instrument, the only portion of which necessary to an understanding of the case is as follows:

'Contract of Sale.
'Denver, Colo., April 25, 1916.
'Received of Gertrude Cullen, of the city and county of Denver and state of Colorado the sum of fifty dollars as part payment on purchase price of lots number 12, 13, N. 1/2 14, in block number 9, in Park Club Place, an addition to the city and county of Denver, Colorado. Full purchase price of said property being eighteen hundred seventy-five dollars, payable as follows: Cash as above, fifty dollars; twenty-five dollars ($25.00) on the first day of each month, commencing May 1, 1916, for 12 months; fifty dollars ($50.00) per month thereafter commercing May 1, 1917, until May 1, 1919, on which date the balance of the purchase price is to be paid. All payments to be made at the office of the company in the city of Denver. All deferred payments to bear interest at 6 per cent. per annum, payable January 1st and July 1st in each year. * * * Abstract of title will be furnished purchaser within 10 days.

'Time is the essence of this contract, and the failure to make each and all of the several payments at the place and times herein specified shall, at the election of the said Park Club Land Company, work an absolute forfeiture of all rights of the said purchaser under this contract, and in that case all payments on the purchase price aforesaid shall be forfeited to the Park Club Land Company, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages; the same being hereby agreed to be the reasonable compensation to be made on account of the failure to complete the purchase and take the property under this contract as above specified.

'The purchaser agrees to pay all general taxes and all special assessments levied and assessed on this property for the year 1916 and thereafter.

Gertrude Cullen. [Seal.]

'The Park Club Land Company,
'By R. H. Malone.'

This instrument was set up in the complaint, and it was further alleged that the cash payment of $50 and monthly payments until October 1, 1916, were made; that thereafter defendant failed and refused to make further payments, or to pay interest on deferred payments, or to pay taxes. The answer admitted the execution of the instrument, admitted the payments and the failure to pay. The denials of this answer were confined to mere conclusions. Plaintiff filed a motion to strike out the answer, and for judgment on the pleadings whereupon the answer was amended, and thereafter judgment on...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Ravenstar LLC v. One Ski Hill Place LLC
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Colorado
    • 28 Enero 2016
    ...relies on two Colorado cases for the proposition that a seller may elect between liquidated damages and actual damages.¶ 20 In Cullen v. Park Club Land Co., the Colorado Supreme Court interpreted a real estate agreement that allowed the buyer to pay in installments. 67 Colo. 210, 211–12, 18......
  • Armstrong v. Irwin
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arizona
    • 22 Diciembre 1923
    ...... under the conditions therein expressed, a quarter-section of. land situated in Maricopa county, Arizona, for a. consideration of $59,100, to ...960;. Meagher v. Hoyle, 173 Mass. 577, 54 N.E. 347; Cullen v. Park Club Land Co., 67 Colo. 210, 184 P. 303. . . [26. ......
  • DeFeyter v. Riley
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Colorado
    • 25 Octubre 1979
    ..."purchaser agrees to buy." Such terms are indications of the parties' mutual obligation to sell and purchase. See Cullen v. Park Club Land Co., 67 Colo. 210, 184 P. 303 (1919). The contract in question contains provisions permitting defendant Riley to retain the plaintiffs' $4,000 part paym......
  • Thompson v. Sweet
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Colorado
    • 28 Noviembre 1932
    ......101, 278 P. 611, on which the. partnership relied; and that Cullen v. Park Club Land. Co., 67 Colo. 210, 184 P. 303, is ample authority for. ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT