Culmer v. Canby
Decision Date | 08 May 1900 |
Docket Number | 768. |
Parties | CULMER v. CANBY et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit |
William C. Herron, for plaintiff in error.
Before LURTON and DAY, Circuit Judges, and CLARK, District Judge.
This case presents a single question, namely, the correctness of the ruling of the court below upon a general demurrer to the petition undertaking to recover for an alleged libel. The petition is quite voluminous,-- more so than is required under the Ohio practice which prevails on the law side of the federal courts. Under section 5093, Rev. St. Ohio, it is sufficient to state in an action for libel that the defamatory matter was published of the plaintiff. In the petition a part of the alleged libel is set up, with accompanying innuendoes, and a copy in full of the alleged libelous matter is attached as an exhibit to the petition. After the demurrer was filed but before it was passed upon, it was stipulated that the entire article should be regarded as a part of the petition. In view of this stipulation, we regard the petition as counting upon an alleged libel published of and concerning plaintiff, as set forth in said publication; and the question presented is, should a general demurrer to the petition be sustained? The alleged libel is as follows:
'The Computing Scale Company, O. O. Ozias, Gen. Manager.
'Dayton, Ohio, August 12, 1895.
It is unnecessary to determine whether the innuendoes undertaking to set forth the meaning of a part of the publication are justified by the terms of the publication itself. An innuendo can neither enlarge nor restrict the meaning of words beyond their ordinary or usual signification, and upon general demurrer the question is not whether the alleged libel will bear...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Dupont Engineering Co. v. Nashville Banner Pub. Co.
...145 F. 904, 76 C. C. A. 436; Security Benefit Association v. Daily News Publishing Co. (C. C. A.) 299 F. 445; Culmer v. Canby et al. (6th Cir.) 101 F. 195, 41 C. C. A. 302. In the case of International Text-Book Co. v. Leader Printing Co. (C. C.) 189 F. 86, it was held by District Judge Kil......
-
Lauder v. Jones
...and Slander, 32, 3-4-5; St. James Military Academy v. Gaiser, 28 L.R.A. 667; Weston v. Grand Rapids Pub. Co., 87 N.W. 258; Culmer v. Canby et al., 101 F. 195; White Nicholls, 3 How. 266, 11 L.Ed. 591; Davis v. Hamilton, 88 N.W. 744; State v. Shippman, 86 N.W. 431; Schenk v. Schenk, 20 N. J.......
-
Samuelson v. Tribune
... ... To the ... same effect see Press Pub. Co. v. McDonald, 63 F ... 238, 11 C. C. A. 155, 26 L. R. A. 53; Culmer v ... Canby, 101 F. 195, 41 C. C. A. 302; Chanler v. Town ... Topics Pub. Co., et al., 161 F. 105, 88 C. C. A. 269; ... Martinson v ... ...
-
Nichols v. Daily Reporter Co.
...esteem of society for him. It is not necessary that the words imputed dishonesty or immorality of any special kind or character." (Culmer v. Canby, 101 F. 195; Pfitzminger Dubs, 64 F. 696; Werner v. Vogelli, 63 P. 607.) Henderson, Pierce, Critchlow & Barrette for respondent. RESPONDENT'S PO......