Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Commonwealth

Decision Date15 March 1929
Citation228 Ky. 453
PartiesCumberland Pipe Line Company v. Commonwealth.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

3. Words and Phrases. — The "market value" of a commodity is its selling price in usual and ordinary course of business, but, if there be no market at particular place at which it is desired to fix market value, then market value is taken at nearest point available with adjustments to care for cost of transportation to that market.

4. Licenses. — It is no objection to the validity of an occupation tax that the amount of the tax is measured by the value of the thing produced.

5. Commerce. — An occupational tax is not subject to attack under Federal Constitution on ground that volume of sales on which amount of tax is adjusted includes sales of goods that have been or may be articles of interstate commerce, since, though interstate commerce itself cannot be taxed, receipts of property or capital employed therein may be taken as the measure of a lawful state tax.

6. Constitutional Law. — No one has a right to attack a statute as unconstitutional, unless he can show that its enforcement against him has violated, or will violate, his constitutional rights.

7. Constitutional Law. — Since, under Acts 1918, c. 122, amending Acts 1917, c. 9, imposing occupational tax on producers of oil in state based on market value of oil produced and payable in first instance by pipe line company after it has left producer's possession, pipe line company has right to reimbursement from producer, it cannot attack constitutionality of the act as violating Constitution U.S. Amend. 14, in not granting real taxpayers a hearing before state authorities in respect to assessment of value, where producers who were real taxpayers made no such complaint.

Appeal from Franklin Circuit Court.

EDW. C. O'REAR and CRAWFORD & HARRIS for appellants.

J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and JAMES M. GILBERT, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE DIETZMAN.

Affirming.

The sole question presented by this appeal is whether chapter 122 of the Acts of 1918, hereinafter called the 1918 act, violates the Federal Constitution or not. The title to that act is:

"An Act to amend and re-enact chapter 9 of the Acts of the extraordinary session of the General Assembly of 1917, which Act imposes a license or franchise on any person, firm, corporation, or association engaged in the production of crude petroleum in this State, and authorizing county officials to impose such tax for roads, schools and county purposes; providing methods of determining the amount of tax due and prescribing the manner of payment of State tax and imposing penalties for the violation of the Act."

The pertinent provisions of the act necessary to a solution of the issues raised are:

"Sec. 1. Every person, firm, corporation or association producing crude petroleum oil in this State, shall, in lieu of all other taxes on the wells producing said crude petroleum, annually pay a tax equal to 1 per centum of the market value of all crude petroleum so produced, and such tax shall be for State purposes, and, in addition, any county in the State may impose a like tax for road purposes, county purposes or school purposes not to exceed one-half of one per centum of the market value of all crude petroleum produced in such county, and the fiscal court of any county may levy said tax for county purposes and shall determine what fund or funds shall receive the taxes when collected, and, when crude petroleum is produced in any separate taxing district in a county, the fiscal court shall equitably distribute such taxes between the county and such taxing district. . . .

"Sec. 3. The tax hereby provided for shall be imposed and attach when the crude petroleum is first transported from the tanks or other receptacles located at the place of production.

"Sec. 5. Every person, firm, corporation or association engaged in the transportation of crude petroleum in the State from the tanks or other receptacles located at the place of production in the State, shall for the purposes of this Act, be considered a transporter of crude petroleum, and every such transporter of crude petroleum shall make a monthly, verified report to the State Tax Commission, on or before the 20th day of the month succeeding the month in which the crude petroleum is so received for transportation, showing the quantity of each kind or quality of all crude petroleum so received from each county in the State and the market value of such crude petroleum on the first business day after the tenth day of the month in which such report is made and such report shall show any sales of such crude petroleum so received, in which event it shall show the quantity of crude petroleum in each sale, the date of each sale, and the market price of such crude petroleum on each date of sale for such preceding month, and said report shall be made upon blanks furnished and prescribed by the State Tax Commission.

"Sec. 6. The State Tax Commission shall, upon receiving the reports provided for in section 5 hereof, upon such reports and such other reports and information as it may secure, assess the value of all grades or kinds of crude petroleum so reported for each month, and, on or before the last day of the month in which such reports are required to be made, notify each transporter of crude petroleum so reporting of such assessment, and certify such assessment to the county clerk of each county which has reported the levy of the county tax provided for in section 2, for record, and such county clerk shall immediately deliver a copy thereof to the sheriff of such county for the collection of such county tax. The transporter so notified of the assessment shall have until the twentieth day of the month following such notice, in which to be heard by the State Tax Commission on any objection to such assessment, and the assessment shall become final on such twentieth day of the month and the tax be due and payable on that day. The State Tax Commission shall make the assessment of the value of the crude petroleum so reported by each transporter of crude petroleum as follows:

"Where the report shows no sale of crude petroleum during the month covered by such report, then the market value of crude petroleum on the first business day after the tenth day of the month in which the report is made shall be fixed as the assessed value of all crude petroleum covered by such report.

"But where the report shows sales of crude petroleum during the month covered by such report, if it shows that all crude petroleum so reported has been sold, then the market price of such crude petroleum on each day of such sale or sales shall be the assessed value of all crude petroleum sold on such date of sale and the total amount of the tax to be reported as the assessment on such report shall be the total of the assessment or assessments made on such sale or sales; but if such report shows that any part of the crude petroleum so reported remains unsold, then as to such portion remaining unsold the market price of the crude petroleum on the first business day after said tenth day of the month following the month covered by such report, shall be fixed as the assessed value of such portion of the crude petroleum unsold, and the total amount of the tax to be reported as the assessment on such report shall be the total of the assessments made on such sold and unsold crude petroleum.

"The State Tax Commission in making its assessments shall take into consideration transportation charges.

"Sec. 7. Every person, firm, corporation or association required to make report as provided in section 5 hereof, shall be responsible and liable for the taxes as herein set forth on all crude petroleum so received by it, and shall collect from the producer in either money or crude petroleum the taxes imposed under the provisions of this act; but, if collection is in crude petroleum, such transporter is authorized and empowered to sell the same, and pay said taxes by check or cash to the State Tax Commission or sheriff, as provided in this act."

By a stipulation as to facts, the parties agree:

"The methods employed in connection with the receipt and transportation of crude oil by the Cumberland Pipe Line Company within and through the state of Kentucky are as follows:

"The producer pumps the oil from his well into his own tank. These tanks, which are sometimes of wood and sometimes of iron, vary greatly in size, but most of them are relatively small, containing, when full, less than one hundred barrels of crude oil.. . . The Pipe Line Company attaches its pipe to the tank a few inches above its bottom and controls the flow by a stop-cock in the pipe. . . .

"The producer notifies the company that he desires the latter to take oil from a certain tank, but it is not known beforehand just how much oil is in the tank, nor does the producer usually name a definite...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Dorman v. Dell
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • June 24, 1932
    ... ... trust company organized under the laws of this Commonwealth ... shall for any reason be suspended or closed, or is now ... suspended ... [52 S.W.2d 895] ... infringes some right of his. Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v ... Com., 228 Ky. 453, 15 S.W.2d 280; Sullivan v ... ...
  • Dorman, Banking Com'R v. Dell
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • September 27, 1932
    ...law that no one may attack the validity of a statute, unless he shows that it infringes some right of his. Cumberland Pipe Line Co. v. Com., 228 Ky. 453, 15 S.W. (2d) 280; Sullivan v. Berry, 83 Ky. 198, 4 Am. St. Rep. 147. The officer may question the validity of a statute to the extent it ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT