Cummings v. Arapahoe Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, Court of Appeals No. 18CA0499

Decision Date06 September 2018
Docket NumberCourt of Appeals No. 18CA0499
Citation440 P.3d 1179
Parties Michael CUMMINGS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ARAPAHOE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT and David C. Walcher, individually and in his capacity as Arapahoe County Sheriff, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • People v. Jompp
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 6 Septiembre 2018
    ... ... 2004) ; see also Dept of Transp. v. Stapleton , 97 P.3d 938, 943 (Colo. 2004) ... ...
  • Jackson v. Stonebridge Hosp. Assocs.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 31 Octubre 2019
    ...the at-will presumption and serve as the basis for a breach of an implied employment contract claim. See Cummings v. Arapahoe Cty. Sheriff's Dep't, 440 P.3d 1179, 1185 (Colo. App. 2018); accord Sidlo v. Millercoors, LLC, 718 F. App'x 718, 730 (10th Cir. 2018) (explaining that under Colorado......
  • Guy v. Whitsitt
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 11 Junio 2020
    ...The simple answer to this, however, is that the Town may not, by contract, evade its statutory obligations. Cf. Cummings v. Arapahoe Cty. Sheriff's Dep't , 2018 COA 136, ¶ 43, 440 P.3d 1179 (contracts that abrogate statutory requirements violate public policy and are unenforceable). The Tow......
  • Coates v. Adams Cnty. Sheriff's Office
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Colorado
    • 26 Enero 2021
    ...confers two due process rights on the deputies," namely, notice and the right to be heard. Cummings v. Arapahoe Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't, 440 P.3d 1179, 1186 (Colo. App. 2018). Indeed, for purposes of thisMotion, "Defendants concede that Plaintiffs had a protected interest in their continued e......
1 books & journal articles
  • Making Up Your Own Rules for Resolving Residential Construction Defect Disputes
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 52-4, May 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...[10] E.g., Huizar v. Allstate Ins. Co., 952 P.2d 342, 345 (Colo. 1998). [11] See Cummings v. Arapahoe Cnty Sheriff's Dep't, 440 P.3d 1179, 1187 (Colo.App. 2018) (approving avoidance of part of department manual that violated statutory mandate requiring deputy sheriffs receive timely notice ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT