Currier v. Johnson
Decision Date | 08 June 1903 |
Parties | CURRIER et al. v. JOHNSON et al. [*] |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Error to District Court, Weld County.
Proceedings by Virginia W. Currier and others against Bruce F. Johnson and others for an accounting and construction of a will and other relief. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Reversed.
C.D Todd, H.E. Churchill, Delph E. Carpenter, and Dines & Whitted, for plaintiffs in error.
Esteb & Wolff, for defendant in error Horace G. Clark.
H.N Haynes, for defendant in error Bruce F. Johnson.
James W. McCreary, for defendants in error James F. Tuckerman and William Mayher.
Upon the facts stated in the complaint the court ruled that it had no jurisdiction of the subject of the action. Such facts, so far as material to this ruling, are: July 25, 1892, Warren Currier died, leaving surviving his widow, Lydia M., his sons, George W. and Henry F., their wives, Ella B. and Lucy P., and grandchildren Virginia W., Lydia G., Edward W., Mary B., Farnsworth, and Elizabeth L. (children of George W.), and Louise W., Hazel P., Warren, and Julia K. (children of Henry F.), all of whom were living at the time of the institution of this action, at which time all of the grandchildren were minors, except three.
The deceased left a will and an estate of large value. This will provides: (1) For the payment of debts. (2) Devises certain personal property to the wife of deceased. (3) Gives to George W. Currier the use of the Greeley homestead on certain conditions. (4) Gives to Henry F. Currier the use, rent free, of certain real estate. (5) Provides for the adjustment of certain advancements made by deceased to the above sons. ***"
The will was probated September 6, 1892, and the executors named, Bruce F. Johnson and Charles H. Wheeler, qualified as such September 14th, same year. They acted as executors from that date until May 23, 1893, when Charles H. Wheeler tendered his resignation as executor, which was accepted by the county court, and an order made purporting to appoint Horace G. Clark as his successor. Johnson and Clark continued to act as executors of the estate until January, 1897, when they tendered their resignations as such, and the court made an order (January 30, 1987) appointing James Tuckerman and William Mayher as their successors, which last-named appointees have continued to act as such since the date of their appointment until the institution of this suit, in November, 1899.
This action was by the grandchildren of Warren Currier--residuary legatees of the principal estate, which was required to be kept intact for them--against said Johnson, Wheeler, Clark Tuckerman, Mayher, said sons, George W. and Henry F., their wives, and the said widow of Warren Currier, and was to have an accounting for losses sustained through the principal estate being depleted by the fraudulent and illegal acts of its trustees; to have the will construed, and the question settled as to where the legal title of the estate now rests; and for other and general relief. Johnson and Wheeler depleted the principal estate (as it is alleged) during their administration in the sum of $2,796.72, such depletion being due almost wholly to their knowingly and illegally paying out the principal of the estate as the income thereof. This was in violation of their duties as trustees, and to the prejudice, in said amount, of these plaintiffs in error, the residuary legatees of the principal estate. Wheeler's resignation was accepted and Clark appointed without the knowledge or consent of any one of the beneficiaries of said estate. During the administration of Johnson and Clark the principal estate was depleted by them knowingly and illegally (as it is alleged) to the extent of $14,620.32. The facts constituting such depletion are set out in detail. For example, they purchased of George W. Currier a certain interest in real estate, paying him $1,500 therefor, which interest had no value, and said executors knew that it had none, but purchased the same fraudulently and illegally for the purpose of enabling Executor Johnson to collect $500 due to him individually of George W. Currier; that they purchased certain improved lands of George W. Currier at a price which they knew to be in excess of their value in the amount of $1,800; that they bought realty in the state of Florida to the extent of $10,000 at a price largely in excess of what they knew to be its value; all of which purchases were made out of the principal of the estate and to the prejudice of these plaintiffs. During the administration of Johnson and Clark lands were conveyed by them in behalf of the estate, and lands were conveyed to them for the benefit of the principal estate. Plaintiffs in error contend that the county court had no power to appoint Clark trustee of the estate, and, if so, he was without capacity to convey lands of the estate, or to take title to lands intended to be conveyed to it. They ask for a construction of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Abbott v. Wagner
...Neb. 682, 107 N. W. 865;Fisher v. Fisher, 80 Neb. 145, 113 N. W. 1004;Klug v. Seegabarth, 98 Neb. 272, 152 N. W. 385;Currier v. Johnson, 19 Colo. App. 94, 73 Pac. 882. For the reasons stated, we hold that the court below had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the persons of all of th......
-
Abbott v. Wagner
...v. Dennis, 76 Neb. 682; Fisher v. Fisher, 80 Neb. 145, 113 N.W. 1004; Klug v. Seegabarth, 98 Neb. 272, 152 N.W. 385; Currier v. Johnson, 19 Colo.App. 94, 73 P. 882. For reasons stated, we hold that the court below had jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the persons of all of the defen......
-
Oles v. Wilson
... ... Robbins v. County Commissioners. 50 Colo. 610, 115 P. 526 ... [141 P. 491] ... [57 ... Colo. 248] O. A. Johnson and T. A. McHarg, both of Boulder, C ... S. Thomas, Wm. H. Bryant, George L. Nye, and Wm. P. Malburn, ... all of Denver, and James H. Brewster, of ... this jurisdiction, as well as in others. Marshall v ... Marshall, 11 Colo.App. 505, 53 P. 617; Currier v. Johnson, 19 ... Colo.App. 94, 106, 73 P. 882; Carl v. Northcutt, 48 Colo. 47, ... 108 P. 994; Peterson v. Est. of Bauer, 76 Neb. 652, 659, 107 ... ...
-
In re Vance
... ... other person recited in the section. In re ... Mortenson's Estate, 248 Ill. 520, 94 N.E. 120, 21 ... Ann. Cas. 251; Currier v. Johnson, 19 Colo. App. 94, ... 73 P. 882 ... It ... would seem, therefore, the estate being in William Vance, ... trustee, ... ...