Curry Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Byrd

Decision Date18 December 1984
Docket NumberNo. 05-83-01387-CV,05-83-01387-CV
Citation683 S.W.2d 109
PartiesCURRY AUTO LEASING, INC., Appellant, v. J. William BYRD, John N. Johnson, and Robert M. Bryson, individually and d/b/a Physicians Accounting Services, Inc., Appellees.
CourtTexas Court of Appeals

Martin Barenblat, Barenblat & Wolovits, Dallas, for appellant.

Forrest R. Carlton, Smith, Miller & Carlton, Dallas, for appellees.

Before GUITTARD, C.J., and CARVER and CHADICK 1, JJ.

CHADICK, Justice.

This is a breach of contract case. The plaintiff, a Texas corporation, undertook to recover damages from defendants, a Texas corporation and its president, vice-president, secretary, and treasurer, each of whom was a director of the corporation. The only question is the liability of the individual defendants on a contract made by the corporation before its corporate privileges were forfeited because of failure to pay franchise taxes. The trial court denied recovery, and we affirm.

Plaintiff, Curry Auto Leasing, Inc., as lessor, and defendant, Physicians Accounting Services, Inc., as lessee, entered into a motor vehicle lease agreement on December 1, 1980, in Dallas County, Texas. The lease stipulated a term of forty-eight months and a monthly rental of $500.57. Possession of the rental automobile, a 1981 Lincoln, was delivered to Physicians Accounting Services. On September 15, 1982, the corporate privileges of Physicians Accounting Services were forfeited by the Comptroller of Public Accounts of the State of Texas, pursuant to TEX.TAX CODE ANN. §§ 171.251-171.255 (Vernon 1982), and were not revived at any pertinent time.

No evidence was introduced at the trial; instead the parties filed a stipulation of facts of the case in the trial court containing a provision that the court might draw reasonable inferences and conclusions from the facts stipulated. A jury was waived and the case was decided by the judge. At Curry Auto's request the judge made and filed findings of fact and conclusions of law.

Physicians Accounting Services failed to pay the monthly rental due for May 1982 and thereafter. Curry Auto terminated the lease and thereafter repossessed the rented vehicle on September 10, 1982. The lease contained, among its several provisions, the following:

At the election of lessee, the lease term covering any vehicle leased hereunder may be terminated by lessee at any time prior to the expiration of said lease term by giving lessor thirty (30) days written notice of termination.

All vehicles with respect to which the lease term thereof and this agreement has terminated shall be sold, at wholesale, by Lessor to the highest bidder. If such vehicle is sold for an amount in excess of the undepreciated balance of Curry Auto Leasing's cost of such vehicle, if any, such excess shall be deemed to be and is hereinafter referred to as "profit". If such vehicle is sold for an amount which is less than the undepreciated balance of Curry Auto Leasing's cost of such vehicle, the deficiency shall be deemed to be and is hereinafter referred to as "loss". Promptly after the sale of said vehicle Lessor shall deliver to Lessee an accounting and information statement showing the amount of profit or loss.

Final settlement between the parties hereto with respect to each vehicle sold, pursuant to the terms and provisions of this agreement, shall be made within fifteen (15) days after delivery of the accounting and information statement.

If the sale of such vehicle resulted in a profit as defined herein, eighty (80%) per cent of such profit shall be paid to Lessee by Lessor and twenty (20%) per cent of such profit shall be retained by Lessor.

If the sale of such vehicle resulted in a loss, as defined herein, Lessee shall pay to Lessor the full amount of such loss.

In October 1982 Curry Auto sold the repossessed Lincoln automobile in accordance with the contract and suffered a loss under its terms of $6,499.82. After repossession of the Lincoln, Curry Auto paid $27.00 storage fees, and in September 1982 Curry Auto charged Physicians Accounting Services' account with $10.00 late payment fee that became due when rental for September was not paid on September 1st. These items were all ascertained, paid, or charged after Curry Auto exercised its option to terminate the rental contract and after Physicians Accounting Services' corporate privileges had been forfeited. No provision of the contract allowed the corporate officers to suspend Curry Auto's option to act under the quoted provision. The trial court awarded Curry Auto judgment against Physicians Accounting Services for the sum of these items along with interest, attorney's fees, and cost, but entered a take nothing judgment in favor of the corporate officers.

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • In re Jay
    • United States
    • U.S. Bankruptcy Court — Northern District of Texas
    • 30 Septiembre 2003
    ...back to and are authorized at the time of execution of the contract. Id. at 518 (internal citation omitted) (quoting Curry Auto Leasing Inc. v. Byrd, 683 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1984, no Texas courts apply the relation-back doctrine regarding the execution of a deed in certain situ......
  • Tryco Enters., Inc. v. Robinson
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 13 Septiembre 2012
    ...time of execution of agreement, not time when payments came due, and were not recoverable from corporate officers); Curry Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Byrd, 683 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1984, no writ) (applying relation-back doctrine to contract claims arising out of breach of car-rental a......
  • Hovel v. Batzri
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • 1 Marzo 2016
    ...we must “strictly construe” any ambiguity in favor of the party penalized by it. Schwab, 198 S.W.2d at 81 ; see Curry Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Byrd, 683 S.W.2d 109, 111 (Tex.App.–Dallas 1984, no writ).7 Courts have repeatedly invoked this rule of statutory construction when construing Secti......
  • Ranzy v. Extra Cash of Texas, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Texas
    • 21 Diciembre 2011
    ...or implementation" of a contract "relate back to and are authorized at the time of execution of the contract." Curry Auto Leasing, Inc. v. Byrd, 683 S.W.2d 109, 112 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1984, no writ) (holding that debts relating to the breach of a car lease agreement related back to the time ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT