Curtis v. State, Case No. 2D03-2330 (Fla. App. 2nd Dist. 2/27/2004), Case No. 2D03-2330.
| Decision Date | 27 February 2004 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 2D03-2330. |
| Citation | 870 So.2d 186 |
| Parties | FRANKLIN CURTIS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County, Daniel Lee Perry, Judge.
Franklin Curtis challenges the order denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. While habeas corpus is not the proper vehicle to address the claims raised by Curtis, they are cognizable in a motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. It is apparent from the trial court's analysis that it treated Curtis' claims as if they were raised in a postconviction motion. Accordingly, finding no error, we affirm without discussion.
Affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Valdez-Garcia v. State
... ... See Curtis v. State, 870 So.2d 186, 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); ... proceeding and is usually uninvolved in the case. In part because a petition for habeas corpus ... R. App. P. 9.040(b)(1), (c) (providing for transfer of ... ...
-
Clough v. State
... ... See§ 79.01, Fla. Stat. (2009). We have jurisdiction, seeFla. R ... See Watts, 985 So.2d at 22;Curtis v. State, 870 So.2d 186, 186 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ... ...
- Bruno v. State Of Fla., Case No. 5D10-267
- Clough v. State