Cypress v. Tamiami Partners, Ltd., s. 94-2810
| Decision Date | 05 October 1995 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 94-2810,94-2898,s. 94-2810 |
| Citation | 662 So.2d 1292 |
| Parties | 20 Fla. L. Weekly D2248 Billy CYPRESS and Dexter Lehtinen, Petitioners, v. TAMIAMI PARTNERS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership, Tamiami Development Corporation, a Florida corporation; John Sisto and Cye Mandel, individually, Respondents. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Baker & McKenzie, and Richard J. Ovelmen, Miami, for petitioners.
Bohrer & April, and Sanford L. Bohrer, and Susan H. Aprill, and Judith M. Mercier, Miami, for respondents.
Before NESBITT, JORGENSON, and GERSTEN, JJ.
Petitioners Billy Cypress and Dexter Lehtinen, officials of the Miccosukee Tribe, seek certiorari review of the trial court's discovery order setting their depositions. We grant certiorari, finding that sovereign immunity protects petitioners.
Florida state courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction over a Native American tribe unless the tribe has expressly consented to suit or Congress has waived the tribe's sovereign immunity to civil actions. Houghtaling v. Seminole Tribe of Florida, 611 So.2d 1235 (Fla.1993). Here, the record clearly shows that sovereign immunity has attached to shield petitioners from suit. Accordingly, the discovery order below must be quashed as a departure from the essential requirements of law. See Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097 (Fla.1987); Greenstein v. Baxas Howell Mobley, Inc, 583 So.2d 402 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).
Certiorari granted; order quashed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tamiami Partners, Ltd. ex rel. Tamiami Development Corp. v. Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Fla.
...IS SO ORDERED. 1 The dispute between these parties has not been confined solely to federal court. See, e.g., Cypress v. Tamiami Partners, Ltd., 662 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (quashing discovery order on basis of sovereign immunity); Mandel v. Miccosukee Tribal Gaming Agency, No. CV 93-1......
-
Lake Chase Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Sec'y of Hous. & Urban Dev., CASE NO: 8:12-cv-177-T-23TBM
...providing for attorney's fees against the losing party cannot be enforced against the United States"); Cypress v. Tamiami Partners, Ltd., 662 So. 2d 1292, 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995) (citing Houghtaling v. Seminole Tribe of Fla., 611 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 1993), and holding that sovereign immunity ......
-
Fla v. Bermudez
...entity, the State of Florida, then retreat into his own sovereign when it suits him. Similarly, neither Cypress v. Tamiami Partners, Ltd., 662 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), nor Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Napoleoni, 890 So.2d 1152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004), offer any succor to Mr. Roman in th......
-
Miccosukee Tribe of Indians v. Napoleoni, 1D04-1774.
...courts lack subject matter jurisdiction over Indian tribes in connection with workers' compensation claims. In Cypress v. Tamiami Partners, Ltd., 662 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), the trial court issued a discovery order setting the depositions of two officials of the Miccosukee Tribe, the......