Cyran v. Cyran
| Decision Date | 22 February 2017 |
| Docket Number | NO. 2016-1870,2016-1870 |
| Citation | 148 Ohio St.3d 1408,2017 Ohio 573,69 N.E.3d 749 (Table) |
| Parties | Cyran v. Cyran |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS
Montgomery App. No. 27009, 2016-Ohio-7323. On review of an order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 2 of the court of appeals' entry filed November 21, 2016:
"Does the collateral consequences exception to mootness apply to an appeal from an expired protective order when the appellant faces possible collateral consequences that may not be ascertainable at the time of the appeal?"
The conflict case is Wilder v. Perma , 174 Ohio App.3d 586, 2007-Ohio-6635 (8th Dist.).
It is ordered by the court that the clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County.
It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is consolidated with 2016–1737, Cyran v. Cyran , and that briefing in 2016–1737 and 2016–1870 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs under S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.02 through 16.04 and include both case numbers on the cover of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 16.01 through 16.04.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Cyran v. Cyran
-
Saqr v. Naji
...the Ohio appellate districts regarding whether an appeal from an expired civil protection order is moot. See Cyran v. Cyran, 148 Ohio St.3d 1408, 2017-Ohio-573, 69 N.E.3d 749 (certified conflict case). The Second, Tenth, and Twelfth Districts have held that such an appeal is moot in most ci......