D'Alessio v. Gilberg

Decision Date11 October 1994
Citation208 A.D.2d 625,618 N.Y.S.2d 222
PartiesIn the Matter of Grace D'ALESSIO, etc., Respondent, v. Michael GILBERG, etc., Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Gilberg & Gilberg, Mount Vernon (Michael Gilberg, on the brief), for appellant.

In a proceeding to compel pre-action disclosure pursuant to CPLR 3102(c), Michael Gilberg appeals, as limited by his brief and notice of appeal, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Wood, J.), entered January 6, 1993, as denied that branch of his motion which was to have Mr. Justice Wood recuse himself from the case.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Where, as here, there is no allegation that Justice Wood is legally disqualified from presiding over a proceeding (see, Judiciary Law § 14), disqualification is only appropriate where the court's impartiality might reasonably be questioned (see, Matter of Johnson v. Hornblass, 93 A.D.2d 732, 461 N.Y.S.2d 277). On the record before us we conclude that Justice Wood did not improvidently exercise his discretion in concluding that recusal was not warranted (see, People v. Moreno, 70 N.Y.2d 403, 521 N.Y.S.2d 663, 516 N.E.2d 200).

LAWRENCE, J.P., and RITTER, HART and KRAUSMAN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Skripek v. Skripek
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 19, 1997
    ... ... Gilberg, 208 A.D.2d 625, 618 N.Y.S.2d 222) ...         Further, notwithstanding a party's good faith belief that a court's order raises a conflict ... ...
  • Brooklyn Hosp. Medical Center v. DeLeon
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 11, 1994
  • Estate of Drier, Matter of
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 11, 1997
    ... ... [Hugh V.], 221 A.D.2d 549, 549-550, 633 N.Y.S.2d 396, lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 811, 644 N.Y.S.2d 144, 666 N.E.2d 1058; Matter of D'Alessio v. Gilberg, 208 A.D.2d 625, 618 N.Y.S.2d 222) ...         For these reasons, we affirm the decree of Surrogate's Court ...         ORDERED ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT