D'Gette v. Sheldon
Decision Date | 12 November 1889 |
Parties | D'GETTE v. SHELDON. |
Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
1. Under the revenue law of 1879 an action to foreclose tax-liens must be brought within five years after the expiration of the time to redeem. Helphrey v. Redick, 21 Neb. 80, 31 N. W. Rep. 256;Parker v. Matheson, 21 Neb. 546, 32 N. W. Rep. 598.
2. Under the aforesaid law a person who has been in the open, exclusive, notorious, adverse possession of real estate for 10 years thereby acquires an absolute title free from the liens of any taxes which existed on said property prior to the commencement of said period of 10 years.
3. The provision of the statute declaring taxes to be a “perpetual lien” upon real estate must be construed with reference to those provisions providing for redemption of the land sold within two years from the date of sale, and for a tax-deed if desired, and the time in which an action to foreclose the lien may be brought. It was not intended to continue a tax-lien in force after the remedies to enforce it had ceased.
Appeal from district court, Otoe county; CHAPMAN, Judge.C. W. Seymour, for appellant.
Frank T. Ransom, John C. Watson, and George D. Schofield, for appellee.
This is an action to foreclose a tax-lien. On the trial of the cause the court found the issues in favor of the defendant, and dismissed the action. The plaintiff alleges in his petition that ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foree v. Stubbs
...question we regard as fully settled by the following decisions of this court: Helphrey v. Redick, 21 Neb. 80, 31 N.W. 256; D'Gette v. Sheldon, 27 Neb. 829, 44 N.W. 30; Warren v. Demary, 33 Neb. 327, 50 N.W. Alexander v. Shaffer, 38 Neb. 812, 57 N.W. 541. The doctrine of those cases is that ......
-
Foree v. Stubbs
...we regard as fully settled by the following decisions of this court: Helphrey v. Redick, 21 Neb. 80, 31 N. W. 256;D'Gette v. Sheldon, 27 Neb. 829, 44 N. W. 30;Warren v. Demary, 33 Neb. 327, 50 N. W. 15;Alexander v. Shaffer, (Neb.) 57 N. W. 541. The doctrine of those cases is that the provis......
- Aldrich v. Grand Rapids Cycle Co.
- Tarkington v. Link