Daas v. Pearson
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Citation | Daas v. Pearson, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 37 A.D.2d 921 (N.Y. App. Div. 1971) |
| Decision Date | 04 October 1971 |
| Parties | James DAAS et al., Respondents, v. Randolph PEARSON, Defendant, and Edgar Williams et al., Appellants. |
Russo & Sapio, Mineola, for respondents; Frank J. Russo, Mineola, of counsel.
Reid, Devlin, Grubbs & Moore, New York City, for appellants; Joseph D. Ahearn, New York City, of counsel.
Order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated March 5, 1971, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. 66 Misc.2d 95, 319 N.Y.S.2d 537. The time within which appellants may answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after entry of the order hereon.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
11 cases
-
Risenhoover v. England
...sustained through the negligence of others. See Daas v. Pearson, 66 Misc.2d 95, 319 N.Y.S.2d 537 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.), aff'd. 37 A.D.2d 921, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1011 (N.Y.App.Div.1971) (police officer injured in automobile wreck while responding to false emergency call was allowed to maintain negligence ......
-
Lawson v. Stow
... ... v. Hawkins, 686 A.2d 567, 580 (D.C.1996) (violation of federal false statement statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1001, is not negligence per se); Daas v. Pearson, 66 Misc.2d 95, 319 N.Y.S.2d 537, 540–41 (N.Y.Sup.Ct.) (violation of state false reporting statute is not negligence per se), aff'd, ... ...
-
Hurst v. Titus
...v. Concourse 163rd St. Corp., 41 A.D.2d 719, 341 N.Y.S.2d 427; Daas v. Pearson, 66 Misc.2d 95, 102, 319 N.Y.S.2d 537, affd. 37 A.D.2d 921, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1011). The rule stated by Harper on Torts (§ 115, p. 264) is quoted by the Court of Appeals with approval in Miller v. Board of Education, ......
-
People v. Meyers
...reasonable conduct imposed by common law as well as by statute (Daas v. Pearson, 66 Misc.2d 95, 319 N.Y.S.2d 537, affd. 37 A.D.2d 921, 325 N.Y.S.2d 1011 (2d Dept., 1971)). The larceny of the automobile having been shown, albeit by an exception to the rule against receipt of hearsay testimon......
Get Started for Free
