Dade County v. Houk
Decision Date | 23 May 1956 |
Citation | 89 So.2d 649 |
Parties | DADE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, v. Mae Frances HOUK et al., Appellees. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court for Dade County, Robert L. Floyd, Judge.
Francis G. Rearick and Hudson, McNutt, Campbell, Isom & Rearick, Miami, and Ross H. Stanton, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jepeway & Dauber, Walter J. Migoski, Brigham, Black, Niles & Wright and Leon D. Black, Jr., Evans, Mershon, Swayer, Johnston & Simmons, Miami, for appellees.
This cause came on to be heard on the motion of appellees to affirm the judgment appealed from pursuant to 31 F.S.A. Rule 38 of the rules of this court and it appearing to the court from an examination of the record that said motion is appropriate and seasonably made and that it is manifest that the questions raised on appeal are without substantial merit and need no further argument;
On rehearing granted and after oral argument before the Court en banc, it is
Ordered that the per curiam opinion and judgment of this Court affirming the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County appealed from, be and the same is hereby adhered to on the authority of Dade County v. Brigham, Fla., 47 So.2d 602, 18 A.L.R.2d 1221, which case is hereby, in all respects approved and confirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cole v. Sunbeam Corporation
... ... Sept. 26, 1956 ... Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Stanley Millege, Judge ... Eugene C. Heiman (of Myers, Heiman & Kaplan), ... ...