Dahl v. Republican State Committee, 596

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM; DOUGLAS; HARLAN
CitationDahl v. Republican State Committee, 393 U.S. 408, 89 S.Ct. 680, 21 L.Ed.2d 629 (1969)
Decision Date20 January 1969
Docket NumberNo. 596,596
PartiesAllen DAHL et al. v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE et al

Alfred J. Schweppe, for appellants.

Bradley T. Jones, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellants may, if they wish, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97, 87 S.Ct. 1544, 18 L.Ed.2d 643.

Mr. Justice DOUGLAS dissents.

Mr. Justice HARLAN, believing that jurisdiction lies in this Court, would affirm the judgment below.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
61 cases
  • De Arroyo v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packing., AFL-CIO, No. 7456-7458.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • April 17, 1970
    ... ... that § 301 suits should be governed by the state statute of limitations rather than some implied federal ... ...
  • Deboles v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • March 31, 1977
    ... ... to the District Lodge 142 (national) bargaining committee ...         When the 1966 negotiations reached ... 202, 65 S.Ct. 232. The Court went on to state that this duty does not mean that a union cannot make ... ...
  • Tuma v. American Can Company
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey
    • February 28, 1974
    ... ... the internal union procedure, to the grievance committee as a whole, by addressing a writing to the chairman of that ... to appeal this further write the Executive Board and state your case ... ...
  • Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • July 3, 1974
    ... ... Executive Committee, suing on behalf of themselves and all ... other members ... ' complaint, whether predicated on federal or on state law, is that the Trustees and the Union favored the ... 3 (E.D.Pa.1969); Raymond v. Hoffmann, 284 F.Supp. 596, 601-02 (E.D.Pa.1966) ... 20 See n. 19, supra ... 21 ... ...
  • Get Started for Free