Dahl v. Republican State Committee, 596
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | PER CURIAM; DOUGLAS; HARLAN |
| Citation | Dahl v. Republican State Committee, 393 U.S. 408, 89 S.Ct. 680, 21 L.Ed.2d 629 (1969) |
| Decision Date | 20 January 1969 |
| Docket Number | No. 596,596 |
| Parties | Allen DAHL et al. v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE et al |
Alfred J. Schweppe, for appellants.
Bradley T. Jones, for appellees.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellants may, if they wish, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97, 87 S.Ct. 1544, 18 L.Ed.2d 643.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, believing that jurisdiction lies in this Court, would affirm the judgment below.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
61 cases
-
De Arroyo v. Sindicato de Trabajadores Packing., AFL-CIO, No. 7456-7458.
... ... that § 301 suits should be governed by the state statute of limitations rather than some implied federal ... ...
-
Deboles v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
... ... to the District Lodge 142 (national) bargaining committee ... When the 1966 negotiations reached ... 202, 65 S.Ct. 232. The Court went on to state that this duty does not mean that a union cannot make ... ...
-
Tuma v. American Can Company
... ... the internal union procedure, to the grievance committee as a whole, by addressing a writing to the chairman of that ... to appeal this further write the Executive Board and state your case ... ...
-
Nedd v. United Mine Workers of America
... ... Executive Committee, suing on behalf of themselves and all ... other members ... ' complaint, whether predicated on federal or on state law, is that the Trustees and the Union favored the ... 3 (E.D.Pa.1969); Raymond v. Hoffmann, 284 F.Supp. 596, 601-02 (E.D.Pa.1966) ... 20 See n. 19, supra ... 21 ... ...
Get Started for Free