Dailey v. State, CR-91-877
Decision Date | 21 August 1992 |
Docket Number | CR-91-877 |
Citation | 604 So.2d 436 |
Parties | Derric DAILEY v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
S. Alec Spoon, Montgomery, for appellant.
James H. Evans, Atty. Gen., and Robert C. Ward, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The appellant, Derric Dailey, was convicted of robbery in the first degree, a violation of § 13A-8-41, Code of Alabama 1975. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison.
The state's evidence tended to show that on the evening of May 23, 1991, Karen Reagan, a pizza delivery worker for Pizza Hut restaurant in Montgomery, was robbed. After midnight, a pizza order was placed from a pay telephone. Reagan went to deliver the pizza to the address given over the phone. She was apprehensive because a previous incident involving an order placed on a pay telephone ended in a robbery. When Reagan arrived at the delivery address, she took out her .38 Colt revolver and put it in the pocket of a pouch that she wore around her waist. As she headed to the rear of the vehicle with the pizzas, a black man approached her and stuck a gun in her chest. He said, "Give me the pizzas." She complied. He then said, "Give me the money." She was having some difficulty unfastening the pouch around her waist when the man asked her, "How much money is in this bag?" Before she could answer, the man pushed the gun at her and pulled the trigger. The gun clicked but did not fire, so she grabbed the man by the arm and he fell against the window of her vehicle. When he fell against the vehicle she saw a second man standing behind him. Reagan drew her revolver and fired several shots in their direction as they ran up the street. They jumped into a car across the street and sped off. Reagan got back into her vehicle and drove down the same street that the robbers had taken. She saw a car driving through stop signs without stopping and she followed it to get the license number. As she neared the car she saw a man stick a gun out of one of the windows. She did not think that the gun was fired at her at this time.
Reagan returned to the restaurant and called the police. A description of the vehicle was given over the police radio along with the fact that three or four black youths would be in the vehicle. Corporal Michael Thomas, an off-duty Montgomery police officer, saw a car matching the description. Corporal Thomas recognized two of the youths in the car because they had had contact with the police prior to this incident. He followed them for several miles until back-up could arrive and then he stopped them. After the four youths exited the vehicle, he saw pizza boxes in plain view in the vehicle. A pouch matching the description of the one taken from Reagan and a 12-pack of beer were also recovered from the vehicle. No pistol was found in the car.
The four youths were taken to the police station where police discovered that the appellant had been shot in the leg. He was taken to Jackson Hospital for treatment, and while he was there he made a statement to Officer Steve Saint. After he was read his Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), rights, the appellant said that he was in the car when two of the others had discussed the robbery, but that he had told them that he wanted no part of the robbery. He also stated that he was shot by Reagan but that he was just leaning against the vehicle when the shooting occurred. He said that he was not one of the two individuals who did the actual robbery.
The appellant initially argues that the trial court erred in not granting his motion for judgment of acquittal at the end of the state's case. He contends that his motion should have been granted because there was no evidence presented by the state that he was the one who had used the gun in the robbery. He maintains that there was no evidence that he violated § 13A-8-41, Code of Alabama 1975.
Section 13A-8-41, states, in pertinent part:
In Alabama it makes no difference whether the individual charged with robbery was the person who actually held the gun to the victim's face.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Capote v. State
...and buried the rifle used during the shooting. Thus, there was evidence of flight from the scene of the crime. See Dailey v. State, 604 So. 2d 436 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992) (evidence that the robber fled the scene of the crime was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to instruct th......
-
Wilson v. State
...rendered [on conflicting evidence] are conclusive on appeal." Johnson v. State, 555 So.2d 818, 820 (Ala.Cr.App.1989).' Dailey v. State, 604 So.2d 436 (Ala.Cr.App.1992). See also Woods v. State, 592 So.2d 631 (Ala.Cr.App.), writ quashed, 592 So.2d 636 O'Barr v. State, 639 So.2d 533, 536 (Ala......
-
Boyd v. State
...trial court did not err in receiving evidence of the appellant's flight." Long v. State, 668 So.2d at 60-61. See also Dailey v. State, 604 So.2d 436 (Ala.Cr.App.1992) (evidence that the robber fled the scene of the crime was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to instruct the j......
-
Capote v. State
...buried the rifle used during the shooting. Thus, there was evidence of flight from the scene of the crime. SeePage 74 Dailey v. State, 604 So. 2d 436 (Ala. Crim. App. 1992) (evidence that the robber fled the scene of the crime was sufficient to support the trial court's decision to instruct......