Dame v. State
| Decision Date | 15 February 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 74617,74617 |
| Citation | 556 So.2d 1109 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly S81 John Savary DAME, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal--Certified Great Public Importance, First District--Case No. 88-1045 (Alachua County).
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, and A.E. (Ned) Pooser, IV, Asst. Attys. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.
We have for review Dame v. State, 547 So.2d 1038, 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:
DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), VIOLATE THE ONE-SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla.Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jordan v. State, 88-2858
...requirements set forth in article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution. The supreme court recently held otherwise, Dame v. State, 556 So.2d 1109 (Fla.1990); Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla.1990), and we affirm this point on the authority of those We now turn to Jordan's contention t......
- Citizens of Florida v. Nichols, 73623