Damm v. Town of Boylston
| Decision Date | 02 October 1914 |
| Citation | 106 N.E. 177,218 Mass. 557 |
| Parties | DAMM v. TOWN OF BOYLSTON. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Coggan, Coggan & Dillaway, of Boston, for plaintiff.
Rufus B. Dodge and Wm. J. Taft, both of Worcester, for defendant.
This bill of exceptions relates to motions by the plaintiff to set aside a verdict in favor of the defendant on the grounds of conversations by officers of the town in the presence of the jury during the trial, and of improper conduct of the deputy sheriffs in charge of the jury after the close of the evidence and before the rendition of the verdict.
Assuming in favor of the plaintiff, but without so deciding, that exceptions were saved, it is plain that there is no error of law on this record.
The plaintiff declined to appear for an oral hearing of witnesses, and the motions were determined on affidavits and counter affidavits. The judge of the superior court made a finding to the effect that he was not satisfied of the truth of the allegations contained in the motions, and for that reason denied them and refused as inapplicable certain requests for rulings presented by the plaintiff. In substance, the conclusion of the trial judge was that he did not believe that the facts set forth in the affidavits in support of the motions were true. Most of the affiants had been before him in some capacity during the trial. Manifestly he was in a better position to decide upon their credibility and upon all matters set forth in the affidavits than any one else. His findings on the facts will not be disturbed. The rulings requested related either to facts or to matters rendered immaterial in view of the findings. Clapp v. Clapp, 137 Mass. 183; Com v. White, 147 Mass. 76, 16 N.E. 707.
Exceptions overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Thomajanian v. Odabashian
...affidavits of that nature, in view of the patent facts. Commonwealth v. Crapo, 212 Mass. 209, 210, 98 N. E. 702;Damm v. Boylston, 218 Mass. 557, 106 N. E. 177;Hanson v. Hanson, 258 Mass. 45, 154 N. E. 525 and cases cited. It might have been found as inferences from conceded facts that the p......
-
Berggren v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of New York
...v. Boston Elevated Railway, 229 Mass. 421, 433, 118 N. E. 880;Herrick v. Waitt, 224 Mass. 415, 418, 113 N. E. 205;Damm v. Boylston, 218 Mass. 557, 106 N. E. 177;People v. Shilitano, 218 N. Y. 161, 180,112 N. E. 733, L. R. A. 1916F, 1044. Doubtless new trials are not to be granted, on the gr......
-
Berggren v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York
... ... Elevated Railway, 229 Mass. 421 , 433. Herrick v ... Waitt, 224 Mass. 415 , 418. Damm v. Boylston, ... 218 Mass. 557 ... People v. Shilitano, 218 N.Y. 161, 180 ... ...
-
Hanson v. Hanson
...placed no reliance on the affidavits. The whole matter rested in sound judicial discretion, which plainly was not abused. Damm v. Boylston, 218 Mass. 557, 106 N. E. 177;Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway, 235 Mass. 482, 496, 497, 126 N. E. 841;Commonwealth v. Devereaux, 256 Mass. --, 153 N. E......