Damrill v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 14 June 1887 |
Citation | 27 Mo.App. 202 |
Parties | STEPHEN DAMRILL, Respondent, v. ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
APPEAL from the Greene County Circuit Court, JAMES R. VAUGHAN Judge.
Reversed.
JOHN O'DAY and E. D. KENNA, for the appellant.
The plaintiff sued, before a justice of the peace, for damages caused by the defendant's engine running over a wagon team of mules, and set of harness, of the value of one hundred and fifty dollars. In the circuit court, on appeal it appeared that, at the place where the injury occurred, the railroad and a public highway crossed each other at right angles, the railroad running north and south and the highway east and west. A locomotive and tender were running from north to south, while the plaintiff's wagon, driven by George Ketney, was approaching the track from the east. A few extracts from the testimony will best show how the case was put to the jury.
Ketney testified:
Jerry Youngblood, who was riding in the wagon with Ketney, testified:
The plaintiff testified: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hilz v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
...(1) Plaintiff's testimony did not make a prima facie case and the demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained. Damrill v. Railroad, 27 Mo.App. 202; Powell Railroad, 76 Mo. 80; Railroad v. Hammet, 32 Am. & Eng. R. R. Cases, 128; Young v. Railroad, 107 N.Y. 500; Harlan v. Railroad, 64......
-
Underwood v. St. Louis Iron Mountain & Southern Railroad Co.
...80 Mo. 335; Grocer Co. v. Railroad, 89 Mo.App. 534; Stepp v. Railroad, 85 Mo. 229; Jackson v. Railroad, 171 Mo.App. 430; Damrill v. Railroad, 27 Mo.App. 202. (3) Under uncontroverted facts in this case plaintiff cannot recover under the humanitarian doctrine. It requires more than a showing......
-
Fechley v. Springfield Traction Company
...for cars before doing so. [Sanitary Dairy v. Transit Co., 98 Mo.App. 20, 71 S.W. 726; Killian v. Railroad, 86 Mo.App. 473; Damrill v. Railroad, 27 Mo.App. 202; v. Railroad, 136 Mo. 562, 38 S.W. 308; Kelsey v. Railroad, 129 Mo. 362, 30 S.W. 339; Butts v. Railroad, 98 Mo. 272, 11 S.W. 754.] T......
-
Maxey v. Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... sixth and seventh instructions prayed by defendant, leaving ... out of question the others asked. Donahue v ... Railroad, 91 Mo. 357; Damrill v. Railroad, 27 ... Mo.App. 202. (4) Plaintiff is not entitled to recover under ... any view of his evidence. He has stated his whole case, and ... ...