Dana v. Bursey

Decision Date11 December 1964
Docket NumberNo. 5143,5143
Citation169 So.2d 845
PartiesJames Franklin DANA and the State Road Department of the State of Florida, a corporation, Appellants, v. Ruby Sanders BURSEY, Individually and for the use and benefit of the Springfield Fire and Marine Insurance Company, a corporation, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt, Fort Myers, for appellants.

Roberts, Watson, Taylor & Friday, Fort Myers, for appellees.

BARNS, PAUL D., Associate Judge.

Action for negligence was brought by the appellees against appellants and after an adverse verdict and judgment, the defendants brought this appeal. We affirm.

The action arose out of a collision between an automobile belonging to the road department, being driven by the defendant Dana, and a pickup truck, and Joseph Victor Bursey, a laborer engaged in work on the approach to a new gasoline station immediately adjacent to a state highway. The accident, which resulted in Bursey's death, occurred between sunset and darkness, when Bursey was placing trash in a pickup truck partially parked on the highway with no tail-lights on it. It had been backed on to the highway and Bursey was caught between the two vehicles. Dana did not see the pickup truck before the collision.

One of appellants' grounds for reversal was the lower court's failure to give the requested instruction to the jury hereinafter quoted, and its striking language from other requested instructions relating to the 'assumption of risk' by Bursey, which we will not deal with inasmuch as the point will be covered in treating requested charge No. 4, viz.:

'One of the defenses raised by Defendants is that of assumption of risk. This is a plea whereby Defendants claim that BURSEY placed himself in a position of peril and danger and thereby assumed the risk of receiving an injury. Should you find from the evidence that Defendant DANA was negligent in the operation of the vehicle, but that BURSEY knew DANA was negligent or had reason to believe that he was, and yet remained in a place where he was subject to conditions that he should not have remained there, then he did assume the risk of injury from DANA'S negligence. Should you find that to be so from the evidence, Plaintiffs are not entitled to recovery.' (Emphasis added)

The foregoing requested charge is not a correct statement or application of the law of assumption of risk in an action for negligence. The underscored words make the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Kuehner v. Green
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1983
    ...rise to the injury. Henry v. Britt, 220 So.2d 917 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 229 So.2d 867 (Fla.1969); see also Dana v. Bursey, 169 So.2d 845 (Fla. 2d DCA 1964), (actual knowledge is essential to voluntary assumption of risk). In making this determination it is well within the province o......
  • Alexander v. Fiftieth St. Heights, Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1976
    ...rests. Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480, There must be actual knowledge of the condition which creates the peril. Dana v. Bursey, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845, and there must be appreciation of the danger, at the time one voluntarily exposes himself to such In Cleveland v. City of M......
  • Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. Magnuson, 72--876
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 8, 1974
    ...exposure to such danger, Cleveland v. City of Miami, Fla.1972, 263 so.2d 573; Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480; Dana v. Bursey, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845. The answer to the complaint did not adequately allege these essentials and thus, the court did not err in refusing to amend t......
  • Henry v. Britt
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 26, 1969
    ...rests. Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480. There must be actual knowledge of the condition which creates the peril. Dana v. Bursey, Fla.App.1964, 169 So.2d 845, and there must be appreciation of the danger, at the time one voluntarily exposes himself to such risk. A subjective standa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT