Dandorph v. Dandorph, 85-1113

Decision Date16 April 1986
Docket NumberNo. 85-1113,85-1113
Citation11 Fla. L. Weekly 896,486 So.2d 693
Parties11 Fla. L. Weekly 896 Edward DANDORPH, Appellant, v. Patricia DANDORPH, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

William D. Anderson, Jr., and Martha C. Warner, Stuart, for appellant.

Russell J. Ferraro, Jr., of McManus, Stewart, Ferraro & Steger, P.A., Stuart, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We find no abuse of discretion or reversible error as concerns the award of only $6,000.00 in lump sum alimony to the husband.

Considering the gross disparity in the financial circumstances of the parties, we are of the opinion that the trial court erred in denying the husband's claim for attorney's fees. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Johns v. Johns, 423 So.2d 443 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982).

We affirm in part; reverse in part; and remand for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT