Dane v. United States
Decision Date | 04 April 1927 |
Docket Number | No. 4499.,4499. |
Parties | DANE v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — District of Columbia Circuit |
W. J. Lambert, R. H. Yeatman, A. F. Canfield, and May T. Bigelow, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Peyton Gordon, J. J. O'Leary, and J. W. Fihelly, all of Washington, D. C., for the United States.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Appellant Dane and his codefendants Cody and Raymond were jointly indicted and tried on a charge of engaging in a pugilistic encounter in the District of Columbia. Cody and Raymond were acquitted. The appellant Dane was convicted and sentenced, from which he has appealed. He contends that the indictment failed to charge a crime; also that the indictment would not support a verdict of guilty as to him and not guilty as to his codefendants.
The following sections of the United States Criminal Code (35 Stat. 1150, 1152 Comp. St. §§ 10493, 10494, 10506) are applicable to the District of Columbia.
The indictment in question was in three counts. Appellant was found guilty as to the first count, and not guilty as to the other two counts. The first count charged, with averments of time and place, that John Cody and Philip Raymond and Frank Dane ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
United States v. Matthews
...(defendant was personally committing breach of peace to "engage" in disorderly conduct under 22 D.C.Code § 1107); Dane v. United States, 57 App.D.C. 161, 18 F.2d 811 (1927) (defendant who arranged and collected admission fee to prize fight did not "engage in a pugilistic encounter * * * for......
-
SJ Groves & Sons Co. v. Warren
...injunction, compel the performance of a ministerial duty to pay money. McCarl v. Cox, 56 App.D.C. 27, 8 F.2d 669; Dane v. United States, 57 App. D.C. 161, 18 F.2d 811; Baker v. McCarl, 58 App.D.C. 69, 24 F.2d 897; McCarl v. United States, 58 App.D.C. 319, 30 F.2d 561; McCarl v. Wylly, 1 Cir......
-
Frend v. United States
...of the local law making it an offense to aid and abet in a violation of a law. D.C.Code 1929, T. 6, § 5; see Dane v. United States, 57 App.D.C. 161, 18 F.2d 811; Story v. United States, 57 App.D.C. 3, 16 F.2d 342, 53 A.L.R. It is argued, however, that, notwithstanding this, defendants shoul......
-
McCarl v. Pence
... ... He claimed that in the year 1918 he became an officer in the Engineer Corps, United States Army, and had served continuously as such until the bringing of this suit; that he had ... ...